Goeppert Mayer and her contemporaries explained these numbers by proposing that protons and neutrons occupy discrete energy levels, or shells. This model, which is still used to interpret many nuclear physics experiments, treats each particle in the nucleus as independent, but our best quantum theories assert that particles within nuclei actually interact strongly.
Jiangming Yao at Sun Yat-sen University in China and his colleagues have now resolved this contradiction and, in the process, elucidated how magic numbers emerge from these interactions.
Yao says the shell model relies on input from experiments and doesn’t encode details of interactions between each particle. Instead, he and his team started their calculations from first principles, which means they mathematically described how particles interact with each other, how they stick together and how much energy is needed to move them apart in more detail.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Island_of_stability
Maybe new super heavy elements could do cool stuff if they didn't decay within microseconds. When trying to design ways to make them, you don't want to waste your time making ones that aren't going to be stable, hence the need to predict that.
Ah okay, yeah that makes sense.
So what kind of cool stuff would/might super heavy elements be able to do?
Well we know a lot about oxygen, that can do some really cool stuff. Carbon also, notably cool. For its structural properties Iron is super awesome, but it doesn't work for everything. Aluminum can help fill in those gaps though, and when neither of those work, titanium is the go-to element. I can't imagine where we'd be without sodium, its so important in so many chemical processes. Our entire tech industry relies heavily on silicon. Lasers wouldn't work without those noble gasses, neon, xenon, etc. Uranium has unlocked nuclear power for humanity, thorium promises a potentially safety and cleaner future for that power.
Elements do a lot of different things and we benefit from all of them differently. It's hard to know what a new element would do for us, but there's always the potential for it to be important. What would our society look like without silicon for instance? Without computers the world would be very different, and until we had them, could we have any idea what we were missing?
Cool, so the expectation could be that we would find new elements which would expand the periodic table with new stuff with potentially groundbreaking reactive, conductive, or otherwise good (new?) properties. Is that correct?
Yeah, that sums it up quite nicely!
Interesting! Looking forward to the future of world peace! 🙃
And more relevant to super heavy artificial elements. Americium is great for smoke detectors. Plutonium is very useful for nuclear fission. Plutonium 238 has use in satellites because it constantly gives off a consistent amount of radiation and heat for decades so it serves as a power source
The type of smoke detectors that use radiation (ionization type) are kind of being phased out. How they work (which is quite clever) are a bit inferior at early and reliable detection compared to photoelectric. You can also keep photoelectric ones closer to your kitchen without them going off every time you cook some bacon or use the oven.