cross-posted from: https://feddit.uk/post/44126927

Goldilocks

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 75 points 7 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (14 children)

If that blows your mind then think about this: As the universe expanded after the Big Bang, it cooled from unimaginably high temperatures. In principle, this suggest that there could have been a very short window much later, tens of millions of years after the Big Bang, when the background temperature of the entire universe was capable of sustaining life everywhere. Some physicists have suggested this might have created a brief, universe-wide “habitable epoch,” though this remains theoretical.

I'm not an expert, so this is probably not a muture understanding, but it's cool to imagine a universe where life was incredibly abundant.

Edit: I got this idea from a video, and I found it! Please transfer all criticism of my comment to this video.

  • source
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [–] 57 points 7 months ago* (5 children)

    but it’s cool to imagine a universe where life was incredibly abundant

    There was probably nothing but helium, hydrogen and a tiny bit of lithium at that period.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 35 points 7 months ago (4 children)

    Those are some of the best elements though. 

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 7 months ago (2 children)

    More weird to me is that, at some point before the first stars, the entire universe glowed through the entire rainbow, so there is a moment when, were you to travel back in time, the entire universe would glow blindingly green.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    It probably would never appear green, due to the black-body radiation distribution. When the peak is at green, it just looks like white to us. Our sun is kinda a "green" star due to this

    But it would go from blue to white to red. Similar colour progression that we can find in the distribution of stars

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    I'm skeptical of this. Life doesn't just need a certain temperature, it needs to convert lower entropy energy to higher entropy. A uniform environment temperature does not provide any usable energy. You would still need a star or some other energy source.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 6 months ago

    It also needs something that can form complex molecules. The lightest element we know of that can form these is carbon. That didn't appear in reasonable quantities until the first stars exploded.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 0 points 6 months ago

    Well, "life as we know it". But for all we know energy rather than matter-based beings could have existed more readily back then, and perhaps struggle to exist now under lower density conditions. Thereby making that earlier era more habitable for their type of life, even as our current era is more habitable for our own type.

  • source
  • parent