40
Is it wrong to like Chomsky's "Manufacturing Consent"?
(hexbear.net)
Ask Hexbear is the place to ask and answer ~~thought-provoking~~ questions.
Rules:
Posts must ask a question.
If the question asked is serious, answer seriously.
Questions where you want to learn more about socialism are allowed, but questions in bad faith are not.
Try !feedback@hexbear.net if you're having questions about regarding moderation, site policy, the site itself, development, volunteering or the mod team.
The quality, correctness, or authorship of the work aside. Bad people can say correct things, even the shittest person in all the world could write a book that was good and correct.
This isn't even about art-from-artist, it's not about entertainment, this is just about realising what's an accurate depiction of the world and what isn't. And conversely, writing the most enlightening book ever doesn't absolve the author of their sins.
If we discovered tomorrow that Marx murdered children on the weekends, it wouldn't make Communism any less totally rad of an idea.
we post Mearsheimer a lot for somebody who has awful takes on everything but pre-invasion Ukraine
Side note: Mearsheimer is a realist, and those guys are often wrong. But one of the reasons they're wrong is that they view nation States as "unitary actors" in a chaotic, ungoverned world system, and they're all really into enlightenment State of Nature bullshit.
Eventually someone showed up, and pointed out the obvious with Two Level Game theory, which points out that States aren't necessarily unitary actors, and that internal state dynamics influence the way that state interacts in the world system.
This is what no dialectical materialism does to a mf