[-] Wisconcom@hexbear.net 18 points 2 days ago

Very predictable

I agree, Mike! Social-fascist rhetoric is very predictable; support socdems or you're helping the right.

[-] Wisconcom@hexbear.net 4 points 2 days ago

I am playing Crusader Kings II. I am playing as a Zoroastrian dynasty in Northern Persia with the hope of defeating Islamic powers and restoring the Persian Empire.

25
[-] Wisconcom@hexbear.net 26 points 3 days ago

See any vaguely left-wing movement emerge domestically

Blames it on evil CHYNA

Yellow peril is very tiring.

12
Questions (hexbear.net)
submitted 3 days ago by Wisconcom@hexbear.net to c/chat@hexbear.net
  1. Are you red and in your shed?

  2. Are you green and in the machine?

  3. Are you yellow and ready to mellow?

  4. Are you brown and on the ground?

And, last but not least,

  1. Are you blue and wanting to sniff glue?
[-] Wisconcom@hexbear.net 3 points 3 days ago

Happy Valentine's Day! I have a platonic valentine to celebrate with.

[-] Wisconcom@hexbear.net 15 points 3 days ago

I have often questioned my transness, and been afraid to go through with it over fears it would complicate my life even more than it already is. However, for the first time in a while, I feel happy to be a woman.

[-] Wisconcom@hexbear.net 26 points 3 days ago

The most "investigation" these people do is read an article on Wikipedia and declare themselves an expert on the topic. Anyone with even the most basic amount of experience in real world activism would know that the capitalism of Lenin's time is still the capitalism of today, even if it has gone some minor visual alterations (e.g. direct colonialism becoming semi-colonialism).

People who dismiss educated and prolific revolutionaries on the basis of "they lived 100 years ago" do not deserve serious engagement.

41
submitted 3 days ago by Wisconcom@hexbear.net to c/news@hexbear.net
[-] Wisconcom@hexbear.net 4 points 3 days ago

Thank you. I made a lot of mistakes as an adolescent.

65

I heard my parents get this from their favorite right-wing talk show host. Apparently, not just any form of patriotism, but US patriotism in particular is "apolitical", and thus there is no issue with supporting it.

Note that these are the same people who will insist that the media is getting taken over by malicious people promoting a "woke" agenda but praise commercials which glorify the United States and its supposed values.

It goes without saying that being a patriot for the United States out of all other countries is political, especially given the current regime. Being a "patriot" who supports the establishment in the US is no different from being the same in Nazi Germany.

[-] Wisconcom@hexbear.net 3 points 4 days ago

I think that Hexbear stating its differences from Lemmygrad would, by itself, not cause drama. The two projects can understand their distinctions while still respecting each other. With that being said, I understand why other users would see it that way and decided to delete the post.

[-] Wisconcom@hexbear.net 9 points 5 days ago

I consider Hexbear even letting me in was a sign of trust, but perhaps you are right.

24
I feel mistreated (hexbear.net)
submitted 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) by Wisconcom@hexbear.net to c/chat@hexbear.net

I made a post asking what the key differences between Hexbear and Lemmygrad were, a question I already asked in the Matrix chat, and everyone there gave rude responses and acted as though I was trolling when I was just honestly curious as I never took the time to really engage with Hexbear before. It almost made me cry.

I have problems with my internet use. Every hour, sometimes half-hour, I check back into Hexbear. I suffer from severe OCD in combination with other mental illnesses; I can't help it. I just want somewhere to be welcome without being treated like a rapine beast for a past which I can't alter.

I am not here to cause drama or troll. I have deliberately avoided political arguments to avoid harming the community's flow. Yes, I have done foolish things in the past when I was 15, but have not we all?

I came here under the pseudonym I am most commonly remembered by as a peace gesture to a community which I have disrespected to indicate that I would not hide who I am and I was being honest for once, and I hope people would respect me too.

Is this too much to ask?

[-] Wisconcom@hexbear.net 14 points 6 days ago

They consider China imperialist and said the USSR never achieved socialism and was capitalist actually. I thought these people only existed online.

What definition of "imperialism" are they using? Did they use the term "social-imperialist" at all? These people exist in real life, albeit confined to very comfy armchairs in isolated book clubs, detached from the masses.

They also said AES is a Brezhnevite revisionism and only 2 maybe 3 places have ever achieved socialism but didn't say which ones.

To be fair, it did originate in Brezhnev's Soviet Union, but regarding socialism as ever happening at all is strange for "left" communists. Most of them argue that socialism never existed in my experience.

Looks like you have Bordigists who can't even be consistent with their own ideology. I am sorry to hear that.

40
submitted 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) by Wisconcom@hexbear.net to c/askchapo@hexbear.net

Considering all the recent attention surrounding Noam Chomsky and his connections to Jeffery Epstein, I thought I might ask this question.

I personally think Manufacturing Consent: The Political Economy of the Mass Media is a good book and makes a lot of good points regarding the bourgeois media which few other left-wing authors have made, at least not in such a concise and easily-explained way. When I shared this book with new leftists, they seem to appreciate and comprehend its contents rather quickly. The only part which I found myself majorly disagreeing with was the conclusion in which Chomsky suggests that "American democracy" is "under threat," as opposed to being non-existent in the first place.

With that being said, I consider Chomsky's work to be a pearl in an ocean of bad takes. I think that Chomsky, particularly recently, is an anti-communist propagandist and apologist for the bourgeois system, basically a left-liberal.

Is my take incorrect?

Edit: I failed to mention how this book was co-authored by someone else who is not on the Epstein files. Thank you to all those who mentioned that.

22
[-] Wisconcom@hexbear.net 17 points 6 days ago

It is one thing to recognize the system is problematic. It is another to want to meaningfully change it.

view more: next ›

Wisconcom

0 post score
0 comment score
joined 1 week ago