459
submitted 3 days ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

Gen Z has managed something no modern generation pulled off before. After more than a century of steady academic gains, test scores finally went the other direction. For the first time ever, a new generation is officially dumber than the previous one.

The data comes from neuroscientist Jared Cooney Horvath, who has spent years reviewing standardized testing results across age groups. “They’re the first generation in modern history to score lower on standardized academic tests than the one before it,” Horvath told the New York Post. The declines cut across attention, memory, literacy, numeracy, executive function, and general IQ. That’s not just one weak spot. That’s the whole darn dashboard blinking at once.

Horvath took the same message to Capitol Hill during a 2026 Senate hearing on screen time and children. His framing skipped the generational dunking and focused on exposure. “More than half of the time a teenager is awake, half of it is spent staring at a screen,” he told lawmakers. Human learning, he argued, depends on sustained attention and interaction with other people. Endless feeds and condensed content don’t offer either.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] dogslayeggs@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago

Of course, because that's what kids do. Kids have ALWAYS done stupid shit against the warnings of their parents/teachers. The difference is adults in the past haven't usually given kids easy access to dangerous shit. And in the past the parents would normally be shamed for doing the dangerous shit that they tell kids not to do.

Use your example, pipe bombs: are they easily accessible just by reaching over and grabbing one off the kitchen counter? Because that's how easy it is to grab a cell phone and use AI or TikTok. Do we have Superbowl ads for pipe bombs? Do we have celebrity endorsements for pipe bombs? Do adults happily use pipe bombs on the regular?

Use a different example: smoking or alcohol. While parents will use them both to varying degrees, we as a society have banned kids from doing them. We don't just leave it up to kids to take our warning that both are bad for them.

[-] Smoogs@lemmy.world 0 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Pipe bombs were easily made because of access to things in the kitchen.

And smokes are easy access as are alcohol... Some Kids mark the bottle to hide they were drinking it. Some Kids hide they smoke possibly even today. Reason why there's incense.

And guns are also easily accessed. Some child related deaths in 80s and 90s in the US because guns weren't locked up. Now a kid can get one from Walmart and shoot up a school.

But a lot of this can be shit patents with magical thinking that don't know how to educate their kids and just leave it up to the legal age so the child gets overwhelmed with being an adult magically knowing all the things.

Cuz that doesn't seem to be a factor here in the discussion.

And that's an important one.

Maybe a lot of why the political climate is what it is is for one: lazy parenting. Includes not holding people accountable for making decisions they are capable of making for themselves and instead helicopter the shit out of it till lowest denominator kids learn to get away with manipulative shit like "you let me" excuses like you just did.

we done comparing all generations to their lowest common denominator?

Cuz I know not every child is getting up to this shit.

And I know every not child uses this bullshit excuse.

They learned pronouns easy enough. They can hear other words too to gain understanding of what the world is.

[-] dogslayeggs@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

Are you seriously arguing that building a working pipe bomb is as easy as grabbing a cell phone off the counter? Seriously?

And everything you mentioned (bombs, guns, cigarettes, alcohol) are banned for children. They are not actively encouraged by nearly every segment of society.

My argument was that kids aren't fully responsible for this, and that parents and adult society should take a large blame for it. You seem to agree that shitty parenting is the reason.

[-] Smoogs@lemmy.world -1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

you're so convinced that all it takes is forbidding it so we run a society of forbidding children from phones for fear they can't even monitor themselves rather than educate? Is that your solution?

cuz of the 'you invented it and there for i can't help myself' ? Are you really buying into that shit excuse?

all because of a click bait article?

Cuz this is the precise lazy parent approach rather than educating them I'm talking about here.

Part of battling that isn't obtusely buying into these kind of stupid manipulative excuses and rolling up your sleeves getting involved with the nuances.

[-] dogslayeggs@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

I have no idea what the fuck you just said in this insane rambling.

this post was submitted on 10 Feb 2026
459 points (93.2% liked)

News

35724 readers
2909 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS