edit: changed title from 'False Fukushima Fears' to 'Exaggerated Fukushima Fears', sacrificing my lovely alliteration as others have pointed out that it would be too much to say that the fears of radiation leakages are unfounded, but merely to say that this is the least bad option given previous precedent as cynesthesia has pointed out.
Image is of the large array of water storage tanks holding the tritium-contaminated water.
This week's preamble is very kindly provided by our beautiful poster @[email protected], with some light editing. In periods where not much of earth-shattering importance is happening in the news, I hope to do this more often!
In 2011, the Fukushima nuclear incident occurred. Since then, water has been used to cool radioactive waste and debris, which contaminates the water with radioactive isotopes. Currently, TEPCO, the Japanese energy company that is reponsible to Fukushima, is storing about 1.3 million m^3^ of contaminated water (equivalent to about 500 Olympic swimming pools for our American friends) in about 1000 tanks. Approximately 100,000 m3 of contaminated cooling water is generated per year to this day. TEPCO doesn't want to store escalating volumes of nuclear waste for decades until half-lives are spent. This would mean adding substantial storage capacity every year at increased cost and risk of tank spills.
The contaminated water includes heavier isotopes like caesium as well as hydrogen's isotope, tritum. Caesium is a big atom at 137 molar mass (we love our tremendous atoms, folks) while tritium is heavy hydrogen and has only a molar mass of 3 (pathetic, low energy). The TEPCO people are using water treatment to remove heavy isotopes from water, but not tritium. The large adult isotopes are easy to remove with treatment but tritium is incorporated into water, so it blends in with the others. The treated Fukushima water contains low levels of the big isotopes but still contains tritium.
Isotopes release radiation that damages the body's cells. The longer an individual molecule containing an isotope is in a body, the more likely it is that the isotope will go BRAZAP and release radiation that fucks up the cells. Bioaccumulation is a toxicology term for how certain contaminants can accumulate in the food cycle. For example, algae eat contaminants, then the algae is eaten by bugs, then bugs by fish, then fish by people. Isotopes that are bioaccumulative like our large adult son caesium are more hazardous. Tritium is not bioaccumulative because it is effectively part of water. Water cycles through bodies quickly - that's why you sweat and pee and get thirsty.
Fukushima water would be treated and then then mixed with seawater at a ratio of 1:800 before it is pumped 1km offshore. Each year approximately 166,000 m3 of treated water will be released, which will draw down the volume of contaminated water being stored over a few decades. Real-time stats associated with the release are found here. At the point of discharge, water contains about 207 Bq/L of radioactivity, about 16 times greater than the 10-15 Bq/L background level in the ocean overall. Drinking water guidelines for tritium radioactivity range from 1,000-10,000 Bq/L, if one were to drink seawater.
In wastewater treatment terms, this is a small amount of dilution in a very large body of water. It is unlikely to have any measurable impact per the terms of Western science. In the context of mother nature taking yet another one for the team and environmental distress, this sucks. In the context of making the best of a shitty situation, the Fukushima water release is peanuts compared to the many other environmental liabilities that are not addressed. For example, the Hanford Site is an example of a nuclear wastewater storage facility gone/going wrong in Oregon.
Ending note by 72: By far the biggest impact of the release of this water won't be its direct effects, but those on commerce and international relations. Almost half of Japanese aquatic exports go to China, comprising 8% of all Japanese firms shipping goods to China, and they have now been cut off due to their anger at Japan. Perhaps this reaction and the cancellation of imports was inevitable, as nuclear power and radiation in general is a poorly understood, frightening, and thus easily exploitable topic in every country. China is not the first country to use a misunderstanding of radiation risk to try and achieve a goal - Germany seems very pleased with itself - and they will not be the last.
In all: it is unequivocal that China is massively exaggerating the risks of this water's release. However, the bellicose rhetoric and actions of Japan, South Korea, and America are a much greater danger to the region, and none of the three seem to be in any hurry to try diplomacy instead of increasing military budgets and gearing up for war.
It's that time again - every two months I give myself a week off, to rest and recalibrate. Your regularly scheduled programming will resume next week.
Here is the map of the Ukraine conflict, courtesy of Wikipedia.
Links and Stuff
The bulletins site is down.
Examples of Ukrainian Nazis and fascists
Examples of racism/euro-centrism during the Russia-Ukraine conflict
Add to the above list if you can.
Resources For Understanding The War
Defense Politics Asia's youtube channel and their map. Their youtube channel has substantially diminished in quality but the map is still useful.
Moon of Alabama, which tends to have interesting analysis. Avoid the comment section.
Understanding War and the Saker: reactionary sources that have occasional insights on the war.
Alexander Mercouris, who does daily videos on the conflict. While he is a reactionary and surrounds himself with likeminded people, his daily update videos are relatively brainworm-free and good if you don't want to follow Russian telegram channels to get news. He also co-hosts The Duran, which is more explicitly conservative, racist, sexist, transphobic, anti-communist, etc when guests are invited on, but is just about tolerable when it's just the two of them if you want a little more analysis.
On the ground: Patrick Lancaster, an independent and very good journalist reporting in the warzone on the separatists' side.
Unedited videos of Russian/Ukrainian press conferences and speeches.
Telegram Channels
Again, CW for anti-LGBT and racist, sexist, etc speech, as well as combat footage.
Pro-Russian
https://t.me/aleksandr_skif ~ DPR's former Defense Minister and Colonel in the DPR's forces. Russian language.
https://t.me/Slavyangrad ~ A few different pro-Russian people gather frequent content for this channel (~100 posts per day), some socialist, but all socially reactionary. If you can only tolerate using one Russian telegram channel, I would recommend this one.
https://t.me/s/levigodman ~ Does daily update posts.
https://t.me/patricklancasternewstoday ~ Patrick Lancaster's telegram channel.
https://t.me/gonzowarr ~ A big Russian commentator.
https://t.me/rybar ~ One of, if not the, biggest Russian telegram channels focussing on the war out there. Actually quite balanced, maybe even pessimistic about Russia. Produces interesting and useful maps.
https://t.me/epoddubny ~ Russian language.
https://t.me/boris_rozhin ~ Russian language.
https://t.me/mod_russia_en ~ Russian Ministry of Defense. Does daily, if rather bland updates on the number of Ukrainians killed, etc. The figures appear to be approximately accurate; if you want, reduce all numbers by 25% as a 'propaganda tax', if you don't believe them. Does not cover everything, for obvious reasons, and virtually never details Russian losses.
https://t.me/UkraineHumanRightsAbuses ~ Pro-Russian, documents abuses that Ukraine commits.
Pro-Ukraine
Almost every Western media outlet.
https://discord.gg/projectowl ~ Pro-Ukrainian OSINT Discord.
https://t.me/ice_inii ~ Alleged Ukrainian account with a rather cynical take on the entire thing.
Last week's discussion post.
Initial reports of Ukrainians finally breaching the first line of defence! Don't get too excited though, it appears to only be a smaller infantry group and little armour.
Only 2 more lines to go!
I keep hearing this every few days but I also keep hearing its bullshit.
Ukraine is currently trying to wedge a cosy little pocket between Robotyne and Verbove, as they understandably don't want to get caught up with frontal assaults on settlements and instead wanna drive on through gaps where they can find them, cut off supply lines from behind, and generally cause chaos. This is sort of the plan for the counteroffensive as a whole but in miniature as they've been stuck in the first phase for two months longer than they wanted. In fact, this is the ideal plan for Ukraine in general - they cannot win an attrition war, so wherever they try and take territory, they must try and breach lines, drive quickly, and cause enough mayhem to force the Russians to retreat. Very unlike Russia's slow, plodding, careful pace. Both sides are obviously trying to force their enemy to fight in a way that is detrimental to them, literally a fundamental tenet of warfare.
This pocket cannot be a good place to be right now. Russian channels note that Ukraine is largely making gains - we still aren't talking anything remotely impressive - on land with low elevation, leaving Russia with control of the heights around them. So, Russia is saturating the area with artillery and aviation fire. That all being said, this pocket is adjacent to the first defense line, so it's plausible that Ukraine is making attacks directly towards it. I've seen nothing yet indicating that they've breached it.
Russia regained (or perhaps maintained) control of the southern edge of Robotyne while Ukraine holds the northern edge. It's probably best to just treat the whole village as being in the grey zone, which is nonetheless an improvement for Ukraine compared to a month ago. If Ukraine can't cut the Russians off from behind in Robotyne then it'll cause problems as Russia can fire on the supply lines heading through any breaches and even if they make it through the first defensive line, they will run out of supplies and thus momentum.
I'm not going to make predictions one way or another who will be successful; I've learned my lesson from the past. Just laying out how things currently stand.
Russian telegram reports that the line has not been breached.
Somebody is -ing.
Russian telegram has enough copium to power the next election.
I've seen with my own eyes the Ukrainian takes on the failure of the counteroffensive and why it actually hasn't failed, you could power a copium reactor large enough to power a country with the shit they say.
Russian telegram has its moments, for sure, but when Russia takes an L, they don't retreat into fantasy lands and bury their head in the sand unlike Ukraine, they don't start talking about how Bakhmut is actually strategically insignificant or that it's fine because for every Ukrainian soldier who stubbed their toe, 2929412 Russian soldiers were vaporised, or that actually Ukraine didn't even want to hold onto land that belonged to traitorous locals; they just get depressed and go "Well, some days bad things happen, we need to keep on going..." Again, I've observed this with my own eyes, and I've been following their reactions basically every week since the war began. This is acceptance, the opposite of cope.
If russians know one thing, its the cost of war, and the cost of winning one.
Deep battle tactics go brrrr
So is this all that Ukraine has or is there a larger force waiting in the back to either exploit a breach made in the lines or to try and pivot to another point if the Russian defense overcommits to the initial, smaller push?
All of my layman knowledge of war says that logistics are the actual game winner but I feel completely in the dark on actual army numbers. How many tanks does Ukraine have? How many have been seen so far during the counteroffensive? How many have been confirmed destroyed? I had assumed they had many more than have already been out in the front and that “the true counteroffensive hadn’t started” just based on the number seen, but western reporting trying to soften the blow of how poorly the counteroffensive is going makes me think they actually had far fewer tanks than previously understood and these piddling thrusts might be all they have in them. Who’s to say though