168
Trump Gives Chilling Answer About Whether He’ll Accept Election Results
(www.thedailybeast.com)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 05 Feb 2026
168 points (96.7% liked)
politics
28043 readers
4058 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
They don't have enough of their gestapo goons to stop us from voting. They are saying desperate bullshit now because they know they are going to lose.
This isn't an everywhere strategy, it's a targeted one.
For example, doing this heavily in Fulton county (ATL) would pretty much guarantee that Georgia goes red this time.
They only have to identify a handful of purple states, and then throw everything they have at disrupting voting in their major cities.
And this won't be the only thing that they do, for example they're working on mandating a nationwide real ID requirement for voting, which would prevent literally tens of millions of people from voting.
In every one of those locations, the voting populace will vastly outnumber those gestapo pigs too. We just have to show up with numbers and they will not be able to do jack shit.
I hope you're right, but they don't need to stop everyone.
There are usually key election spots and targeting those is all they'd have to do, they certainly have enough for that.
People have no idea how much goes into every American voting in the same 12 hour window...
Like ICE is big, but the amount of voting locations is insane. Even if ICE focuses on Blue cities, it's hard to find a polling location in a major city that's not less than a mile from another. They're all over the damn place and there's now way they can cover them all
People are stressed and not thinking logically, which is exactly what trump and the oligarchs work.
Also I suspect that their actual plan is to declare fraud and try to force their candidates, but I suspect that's more likely to result in Republican candidates having UN Owen was her played with their skull by state troopers if they try to force the situation well either that or a nullification crisis.
I guess you haven't yet realized that every single law enforcement officer in America is on the same team as these guys.
They don't have enough of them either. They are like a fraction of a percent of the overall population. They ain't gonna stop us.
We'll see. They have been pulling this fascist bullshit for a century and no one has stopped them yet.
No, this bullshit is pretty different from business as usual. It's quite important that everyone understands that.
Want a list of people that have been killed by the border patrol that you didn't give a shit about?
Yes go ahead and list every one of them. I'll print it out and mail it to the Give A Shit headquarters posthaste.
I know a police chief who hates Trump with a burning passion. Stop thinking they are all like Arpaio.
Want about a million counter examples?
You say every one, someone else says there are exceptions, you say obviously but this is true for most of them, they say yeah that’s fair, and nothing of substance is added to the discussion. Why not skip that whole rigamarole and just start with “the vast majority” or “nearly every one” instead of unnecessarily hyperbolizing?
Most people have brains that can process obvious hyperbole without falling all over themselves.
See, there you go! Now I can’t point out the one guy that demonstrates an exception if you stated “every person” instead of most! I get that it’s an annoying thing to change, but is it more annoying than having this conversation multiple times?
You should realize that most people don't find the concept of a discussion annoying or challenging, but i expect that probably is not the case for conversations that include you.
I find it annoying when a large portion of law enforcement would likely help the federal government interfere with elections and people start nitpicking over exactly how many. If I can offer a simple solution to prevent getting sidetracked like that in the future, I will.
No, but they might have enough to send to purple/blue areas to scare non-white demographics to stay away and sway the elections.
If you're in one of these areas, take action. Contact your local, state, and federal reps to ensure polling place integrity. Sign up to work the polls. Volunteer to escort people to the polls, especially if you're a white male.