362
"lessons learned"
(thelemmy.club)
"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"
A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.
AI, in this case, refers to LLMs, GPT technology, and anything listed as "AI" meant to increase market valuations.
I like how you two think, reducing the required transistor count from tens of billions (mostly DRAM bits) to 26 to zero.
(For the daytime question, personally I'd use a photocell to measure sunlight, one transistor to amplify the signal, another to switch based on a threshold, and a third as an oscillator driving a 3-pin piezzo buzzer at its natural frequency. No more semiconductors required. Nowadays, an LCD digital alarm clock from a dollar store is a potentially cheaper, silently running solution. It also shows time with an update every second that does not send 120k tokens back and forth, and uses so little energy that its single AAA alkaline battery will expire and corrode before fuly discharging.)
and that is precisely why you are not a CEO
Light pollution on an overcast night might give your photoreceptor a false positive
If the photocell is pointed east, weather does make a big difference. For other bearings, less so. And light pollution is more or less the same every night so it can be accounted for. Still, I suggested an LCD alarm clock as a decent compromise between accuracy, feature set, cost and transistor count. An analog one has fewer, closer to a 555, but will use more energy and produce a ticking sound (still less than the computers' fans). And then there's a windup one or a rooster...
“GET MILK AND A TRANSISTOR”
Now required transistor count is -1