380
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 04 Feb 2026
380 points (99.7% liked)
News
35471 readers
2817 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
TikTok was never "Chinese Propaganda". It had roughly as many American investors as Chinese investors, with management centered in Singapore.
But the Singapore owners didn't bend over backwards to purge any Palestinian Rights power users. So it got slandered as "China Social Media" as an excuse to force the sale of the US operations.
Tiktok is not a Chinese propaganda like fb, twitter, and reddit "aren't" US propaganda.
A mega addictive social media platform with a world wide audience would not be able to operate independently without its state wanting to exploit that reach.
The line from the Biden Administration was that TikTok propagated anti-Zionist mass media. It was "Hamas Propaganda" according to the prior regime's leadership.
Exactly, this isn't complicated. As you say, reddit facebook and Twitter are absolutely undeniably American propaganda and anyone disagreeing doesn't understand what the word means. In the same vein, tiktok was Chinese propaganda.
It was absolutely Chinese propaganda, it's absurd anyone would say that it wasn't. Literally you thinking it isn't Chinese propaganda is a result of the Chinese propaganda on it.
How was it chinese propaganda? Did they ban people for saying tiannamen square or something?
I've only heard FUD surrounding tiktok, like the CCP having access to all of its data. That's not the same as propaganda. I've also never seen proof of them use that access maliciously and the US government now has access to all of the data a la PRISM.
We're moving from reality to orthodoxy. You're making an unfalsifiable claim.
Do you think there's any social media platform isn't being used as a propaganda machine at this point? If not, why wouldn't the Chinese government use it for this purpose? If so, what makes TikTok different than anyone else?
TikTok was replete with all sorts of advertisements, marketing campaigns, and influencer content. Nobody is claiming it lacked a surplus of propaganda.
The claim Biden's administration made was that Beijing bureaucrats were dictating the social media feed of American TikTok users based on Palestine-friendly media content served up during the 2024 primaries. This is a fully unsubstantiated allegation. Nevertheless, it was used to justify the forced sale of the US branch of the application to Trump-aligned business interests.
Well we can't do more than speculate since we don't have inside information, but this push started during Trump's last term before Biden was elected so it seems both of them are aligned on this point. Considering everyone is using social media to push their own nationalist propaganda, I don't see how one could argue China wasn't doing it too especially considering they're also a global superpower just like the US. Why wouldn't they use it for this purpose?
https://www.npr.org/2020/08/06/900019185/trump-signs-executive-order-that-will-effectively-ban-use-of-tiktok-in-the-u-s
We have individuals in the government on record for their reasoning.
...
I'm not sure what this proves as I put zero stock in the word of a Republican senator. He could be telling the truth or he could be an opportunist using the support for Israel's genocide in Palestine to push the narrative he wants.
He was the primary advocate and original co-sponsor for the bill that Joe Biden eventually signed. If you're not taking his word at why he authored the legislation, advanced it through his own committee, and pushed it onto the President's desk, who else are you going to listen to?
Again I don't see what this angle proves or disproves? I don't trust his word because Republican politicians have zero credibility. I also think Joe Biden has zero credibility and them advancing this through bureaucratic procedure doesn't make it any more or less credible. Even if the claim that they used it to push anti-Israel propaganda is false, it doesn't mean the claim that China used it to push propaganda is false.
Given what we know about social media and powerful governments leveraging it to their benefit, my default belief is to assume that they were using it for this purpose until proven otherwise. Nobody has yet attempted to even make an argument as to why they wouldn't also be using it for the same purpose, especially considering they've been running "the great firewall" to control the flow of information to their own population for more than 20 years.
They're highly credible on their professed loyalty and support for Israel.
TikTok is not a Chinese company, it is not run by Chinese apparatchiks, and it isn't integrated into the Chinese state media system. It is a Singapore based company invested into by a conglomeration of international investors.
Why would you assume the Chinese government is calling the shots and not any of the governments of other TikTok investors?
It isn't as though TikTok lacked Israeli-favorable propaganda. The Israeli media simply didn't trend as well as Palestinian Rights media. How does this lead you to conclude China is to blame? Wouldn't a Palestine-symathetic state be a more likely culprit? Qatar, for instance?
this claim is totally different from "TikTok is Chinese propaganda".
"Could/Would" is not the same as "is"
It's not a totally different claim. "Could/would" is what we use when we're forced to speculate due to a lack of insider knowledge. Claiming that it "isn't" is no more valid than claiming that it "is" in this situation, but we can use context clues like the fact that other nations are using social media for the same purpose and it originating in China, a fellow world superpower, to reason that they would be using it for similar purposes. Why wouldn't they be using an effective tool like this? This stuff isn't being created for altruistic reasons.
You mean you want people to believe unsubstantiated claims that lack evidence?
Still don't see any argument that justifies substituting "could/would" with "is" except vague notion of "we do it, so they're definitely doing it"
Just because we don't have a signed confession and video recorded statement from the leader of China detailing a propaganda campaign doesn't mean this is a completely unsubstantiated claim that lacks evidence. I listed numerous pieces of circumstantial evidence and we can use Occam's Razor to conclude they would use this for that purpose.
We don't have hard evidence proving that Trump raped kids with Epstein, but I'd bet you believe he did based on the circumstantial evidence that we do know, so what's the difference between this and that? It's not as if China is a benevolent and altruistic world superpower. They're going to have their fingers in every pie just like the US would/does.
Can you provide any evidence, whether direct or circumstantial, demonstrating that they weren't using it for this purpose in order to substantiate the claim of "isn't?" Can you even make a good argument for why they wouldn't especially as a counter to all the western platforms doing it?
It censored Tiananmen Square and fostered a positive impression of China politically, economically, and socially. It openly promoted propaganda. Hell, all those "traditional Chinese manufacturing" videos were literally state sponsored. Are you operating on some extremely narrow definition of propaganda?
Looks like you're wrong. Hopefully you can learn from this so you can prevent it from happening in the future.
Unfortunately, nobody expects you to own up to it because that's just how your kind operates.
People on lemmy can't read any better than people on reddit. Censored. Past tense. This was all in the news a few years ago for those of us that haven't had their attention spans ruined by tiktok and can remember longer than a week or two at a time. Pro-China content is literally propaganda on a state sponsored app. Positive PR for a country is called propaganda. Hope this helps with your ability to understand relatively basic concepts in the future.
Is showing roads in Tiananmen Square not having potholes also considered Chinese propaganda?
The crime TikTok users committed was fostering a positive impression of Gaza.
If you searched for Tiananmen Square, it would censor/remove anything about the massacre, and promote anything about tourism.
Looks like you're wrong. Hopefully you can learn from this so you can prevent it from happening in the future.
Unfortunately, nobody expects you to own up to it because that's just how your kind operates.
Lol, you know nothing of "my kind"
A modern search does not equate to a search from a year ago.