314

New York to create team of legal observers to document ICE raids (www.theguardian.com)

submitted 1 day ago by HellsBelle@sh.itjust.works to c/news@lemmy.world

21 comments fedilink hide all child comments

New York is creating a team of legal observers that will don purple vests to monitor and record the Trump administration’s immigration enforcement officers as they seek to detain and deport migrants, the state’s attorney general said on Tuesday.

The announcement follows weeks of sometimes violent tumult in Minneapolis, where Donald Trump has deployed thousands of armed, masked agents as he tries to deport more migrants than any of his predecessors.

The New York attorney general, Letitia James, said the state’s new legal observers would be volunteer employees from her office, trained to observe, without interfering, whether Trump’s immigration enforcement “remains within the bounds of the law”.

“I am proud to protect New Yorkers’ constitutional rights to speak freely, protest peacefully, and go about their lives without fear of unlawful federal action,” James, a Democrat, said in a statement. “We have seen in Minnesota how quickly and tragically federal operations can escalate in the absence of transparency and accountability.“

The Department of Homeland Security, which oversees ICE, said James was putting New Yorkers in danger by not working with ICE.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] green_red_black@slrpnk.net 31 points 1 day ago

Respectfully we have plenty enough observers via the different Ice Patrols and rapid response groups.

What we need from the State Government is them to actually grow a spine and send their cops and troops after the Green Shirts.

“Keeping to the constitution.” Is not going to save us because this Federal administration is using it as literal toilet paper

[-] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 43 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

While I get what you’re saying, having officially anointed state observers that are sitting there and being like “the state of New York is officially watching you, and I’m it” is a change to the equation.

Sure, it’s “just a few more observers”, but any of those state appointed observers witnessing constitutional (state or federal) or state law breaches are probably going to yield immediate and aggressive state prosecution of any ICE agents involved.

And if ICEatzgruppen decides to accost or arrest any of those officially appointed observers, that’s kind of a signal to begin no-holds-barred total legal warfare.

Public observers are absolutely important. But this is important for a different reason.

[-] DougHolland@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago

Thanks, stranger. Sometimes my cynicism takes me toward dark places, but this is a splash of realistic optimism.

[-] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Hey, no worries. I get pessimistic as fuck about shit these days, especially when everyone who’s ostensibly in a position to do anything about anything is like “this is a very disturbing development 🙁” and then resigns their position in protest or votes to fund ICEatzgruppen or whatever. It absolutely fucking maddening. It damages my calm multiple times a day.

But I view this development as one of the first true signs that officialdom is laying some groundwork to be like “no. Fuck you. We are going to use the system you are trying to abuse against you. And if you end run it, we are going to make it very fucking clear that the system no longer applies to anyone, anywhere.”

Or at least, that’s where I hope this stuff goes.

this post was submitted on 04 Feb 2026

314 points (99.4% liked)

News

35471 readers

3975 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.

2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.

3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.

4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.

5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.

6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.

7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.

8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.

9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.

10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

JonsJava@lemmy.world

gedaliyah@lemmy.world

little_cow@lemmy.world