166

Do they think people will just move on from the fact that their entire ruling class is in a cabal of Zionist pedophiles? They may get away with it, in fact they probably will, but it will always be at the back of the mind. For everyone.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] into_highest_invite@lemmygrad.ml 28 points 1 week ago

i think normalizing third parties should be the primary short-term goal of electoralism. there just isn't anything else for "left-wing" electoralism to do when the first party is designed around sabotaging, co-opting, and destroying left-wing movements.

[-] Le_Wokisme@hexbear.net 15 points 6 days ago

that's reasonable for a movement, but is it the interest of a sitting congresswoman? (and that consideration is another limitation of electoralism) It makes sense for Sawant, but i think all the democrats ran as democrats with the objective of being democrats rather than entryism per se.

you're right for now but i think it's a delicate balance. if any "left" democrat does something cool, they might all start getting pushed out of the party, depending on what the donors think. but i guess the dnc itself is too smart to do that sort of thing all at once. idk maybe this whole train of thought is a dead end.

[-] Le_Wokisme@hexbear.net 4 points 6 days ago

you have Bush and Bowman who got pushed out recently. I think if the leftmost 5% of democrats wanted to do a new party they should've done it during the biden midterms with Bernie before he showed his ass.

maybe now radlibs could be forming an "abolish ice" party. Better to build up PSL but like ram the manparts said none of these people are socialists.

so maybe it's not a complete dead end? maybe 1-2% the democratic party splits?

[-] Le_Wokisme@hexbear.net 2 points 6 days ago

if Walz and Klob were better i could see DFL asserting itself more as a separate entity from the democratic party.

the problem with radlibs doing anything like that is that your 1-2% is all over the country and libs think almost exclusively in terms of national elections. if it was going to happen we'd see a state with zero republican viability and some upstart party challenging democrats from the left.

i have to wonder if most of the states with no republican viability are too professional-managerial to support a strong left wing. the only one i can think of is massachusetts and they're so well-off it's hard to imagine them voting for anyone left of reagan. not to sound defeatist but i suppose electoralism is already not a great avenue for left-wing stuff anyway.

[-] AOCapitulator@hexbear.net 2 points 6 days ago

I love watching this conversation during hitlers rise to power its very funny, talk about the parlimentarian next!

[-] into_highest_invite@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

well so long as you're gonna vote, you ought to vote third-party. so long as you're gonna run, you ought to run third-party. otherwise you're not doing anything electorally to stop hitler's rise to power. and in that case, why not just stay home on erection day and masturbate?

[-] AOCapitulator@hexbear.net 1 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

otherwise you’re not doing anything electorally to stop hitler’s rise to power

you cannot electorally stop Hitlers rise to power what are you talking about?

Unless you are roundabout calling destroying liberal capitalist democracy and therefore stopping it from letting hitler seize power 'stopping hitler electorally'

all i'm saying is if the left wants an electoral strategy, this is it. i'm not saying we should have an electoral strategy. i'm just saying if you're gonna vote anyway, vote third party

this post was submitted on 02 Feb 2026
166 points (100.0% liked)

Chapotraphouse

14265 readers
659 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS