this post was submitted on 28 Aug 2023
35 points (100.0% liked)

Australia

3611 readers
167 users here now

A place to discuss Australia and important Australian issues.

Before you post:

If you're posting anything related to:

If you're posting Australian News (not opinion or discussion pieces) post it to Australian News

Rules

This community is run under the rules of aussie.zone. In addition to those rules:

Banner Photo

Congratulations to @[email protected] who had the most upvoted submission to our banner photo competition

Recommended and Related Communities

Be sure to check out and subscribe to our related communities on aussie.zone:

Plus other communities for sport and major cities.

https://aussie.zone/communities

Moderation

Since Kbin doesn't show Lemmy Moderators, I'll list them here. Also note that Kbin does not distinguish moderator comments.

Additionally, we have our instance admins: @[email protected] and @[email protected]

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Yet house prices remain stubbornly high, thanks Labor for promising to pump billions into subsidising ridiculous house prices instead of addressing any of the underlying problems.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 year ago (1 children)

thanks Labor

Both major parties have been keeping the bubble going since the mid-90 and they keep doing it because it is a vote winner.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The wealth of so many Australians is tethered to property ownership that to threaten housing prices is to basically ask to lose an election.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Only while there are more home owners than renters voting. But with the population being 2/3 owners (half with a mortgage) and 1/3 renters that will not change for a long while.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Not quite accurate: not every homeowner wants this goddamn insanity to continue.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

While I do think Labor's housing future fund is a dogshit policy that will subsidise property developers, both Phillip Lowe and the previous government really do have a lot to answer for in this situation. Lowe told everyone that interest rates wouldn't rise - which, yes they were obviously going to rise eventually and a lot of people have certainly overleveraged themselves. But Lowe really shouldn't have added to this by assuring people that they wouldn't rise. On top of this the lnp loosened lending laws and allowed people to withdraw from their super. Sure there's a certain degree in which people should be responsible for the decisions they make. But expecting everyone to be a rational decision maker at all times is not a great basis for financial policy. Throw in the fomo rhetoric being pushed by the media and you get quite a shitty situation all round.

I do wish the government would at least tax some of the profits that the banks are making off this.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I am curious, if not the private developers how do you propose houses get built?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Labor is doing the right thing. The fundamental problem is there are more people who want homes than there are homes available. By pumping billions into it, labor is stimulating construction which will increase supply and, in the medium and long term, reduce prices.

Short term, prices will go up slightly. But focusing on the short term is how we got into this mess.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

So failing to address negative gearing, foreign investment and increasing immigration helps reduce house prices how?