536
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 30 Dec 2025
536 points (99.6% liked)
science
26825 readers
1299 users here now
A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.
dart board;; science bs
rule #1: be kind
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Fewer
Are shits countable? Does it depend on if they're metaphorical or physical? ๐ค
He meant fewer engagement
Fewer engagement is grammatically incorrect. Fewer shits is colloquially incorrect. If they want to be a pedant, they should at least know what the fuck they are talking about. If I were to try to improve it, I would change "less shits" to "less of a shit" but it's all slang anyway. Anyone suggesting such a correction is a wanker.
Looked at their profile, the funnier thing is that basically every post they make is grammatically incorrect
I know, I was joking.
Not in my area. Fewer shits is correct.
If you want to use less, say "less of a shit".
Yes I think "less of a shit" is the right way (as I mentioned in the comment above).
Where do you live? UK?
I live on the Isle of Quibble.
Ah that tracks
Used in a sentence:
Language is living and breathing, not frozen in amber
counter point: Stannis "the one true king" Baratheon