113
submitted 8 months ago by return2ozma@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Archangel1313@lemmy.ca 29 points 8 months ago

Did no one actually read the article past the vaguely misleading headline?

“I agree with the concerns expressed by parents and players that we have to take into account biological factors such as muscle mass and unfair student athletic advantage when we determine who plays on which teams, especially in contact sports,” Harris reportedly wrote. “With goodwill and common sense, I believe we can come up with ways to do this, without vilifying and demonizing children.”

[-] Joeffect@lemmy.world 24 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Oh, so they are going to mandate weight and height classes across the board for all sports and stop separating sport by gender?

[-] Archangel1313@lemmy.ca 19 points 8 months ago

Prior to Republicans passing laws to outright ban transgender athletes from participating altogether, they actually had standards in place for how long athletes had to be on HRT, before they were allowed to compete. By all physical accounts, this meant that those athletes had comparable muscle mass and bone densities to the gender they identified as.

What else would you expect? Even between biological girls of the same age, there are significant differences between individual athletes. Once you include training, diet and other normal genetic factors...the differences between a trans athlete on HRT and a cis athlete is actually well within those standard margins. Any advantage they might have, comes from skill and training alone.

[-] Joeffect@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago

It was more of a joke in how ridiculous it would be to implement such a system... the logistics would be crazy for team sports...

But like you said, it would be easier to just let them play...

If you want to be crazy you can add a new format for anyone, but men... and make the men's category just open so that anyone can join...

[-] robocall@lemmy.world 18 points 8 months ago

My problem with the article is how much air Americans give to the topic of trans athletes in sports when Americans have more pressing problems. Healthcare, affordability of life, violence are real issues affecting Americans much more than sports games. I don't think giving air to this conversation is helping Americans.

[-] Archangel1313@lemmy.ca 9 points 8 months ago

That's the entire point of all these "culture war" issues. They're used as distractions for more pressing matters, that the ruling class really doesn't want to address, because they know conservatives will be outraged by them, and progressives won't be able to just let people be victimized, for no reason. If the public tires itself out, fighting over topics like these, there's a better chance we won't have the energy to demand real action on more expensive things.

[-] PyroNeurosis@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 8 months ago

"with goodwill and common sense, I believe we can..."

When the folks across the aisle you're champing at the bit to reach demonstrate goodwill and common sense, maybe you might have a ghost of a chance. Until such time, you're validating the position that trans women have no place in established sports.

[-] Archangel1313@lemmy.ca 1 points 8 months ago

So...until then, goodwill and common sense shouldn't apply to your approach? What policy should you adopt, until the other side decides to get their shit together?

Should we advocate for exactly the kind of hyperbolic position that Republicans use as a strawman, to argue against inclusion?

[-] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 2 points 7 months ago

There's no peer-reviewed, statistically sound evidence that trans people have unfair advantages in sports.

Not that sports should matter that much.

this post was submitted on 23 Sep 2025
113 points (83.8% liked)

News

37724 readers
1972 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS