652
Blue No Matter Who?: Jeffries Slammed for 'Gutless' Refusal to Endorse Zohran Mamdani
(www.commondreams.org)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 15 Aug 2025
652 points (97.8% liked)
News
35774 readers
2134 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.
Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.
7. No duplicate posts.
If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.
All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
It does not bode well for you when you call your moral and intellectual superior a moron. I am the reason that Democrats are shit? Lmao you should be in prison just for thinking that let alone writing it in a public space. You are a know nothing witless parasite that doesn’t understand the first thing about the world. Come back to talk when you can learn some respect for your superiors.
“You are the reason that Democrats suck”
“Lmao”
“Insane neckbeard energy”
At least you have a sense a humor. Most right wingers don’t.
That’s because you don’t understand voting or politics, son.
You didn’t ask me a question and you have no idea what you’re talking about. :)
Ok so I’m feeling kind of generous today. I will try to explain this to you as best I can. Vote blue no matter who is an Election Day-only strategy. It is not an advocacy for shitty right wing candidates to win in primaries or for decent people to support prior to the election.
As I mentioned a few days ago, the right wing corporate Democrats never adhere to vote blue no matter who, as Joe Lieberman, Byron Brown, and Andrew Cuomo prove. It is not a strategy for them, it’s a strategy for us; those of us who understand that when there is a guaranteed outcome of one of the candidates no matter what, we have a moral obligation to vote against the worst candidate.
The important part is that since this is an Election Day action, it does not have any effect on the Democrats. The (corporate) Democrats don’t learn lessons, that’s the thing that folks like you need to understand. When they win, it’s because they moderated their message; when they lose, they didn’t moderate their message enough.
If you think random people sitting out elections, even in larger numbers, constitutes collective action, you are sorely mistaken. Only something like a drastic highly organized boycott of the Democrats could yield something like that—and by the time you’re at that level of organization, you might as well be voting real socialists into office. I helped elect Kshama Sawant here in Seattle, so it’s not like that’s hopeless, but we’re talking about a different kind of race.
Democrats don’t get more right wing because voters just keep electing them. The alternative is Republicans in most cases. That’s where vote blue no matter who comes in. Once one of them is gonna win no matter what, you vote against the Republican. This does not have any effect on Democrats whatsoever. Real activism is done in the other 99.9999% of the time you’re not in a voter booth.
It’s time to recognize the stakes for decent folks here. Those of us who understand elections, voting, and politics know that the difference between a Democrat and a Republican can mean life or death for people. That trans person is being ridiculous. Gavin Newsom is a loathsome right wing corporate garbage monger, but he is infinitely better for trans rights than literally any Republican. The Republicans are trying to genocide trans people. Standing on principle that you refuse to vote if he happens to win the primary is insane, selfish, and treasonous.
So let’s assume that you’re right. What is the proposal exactly? Like, what are you saying is what gets us where we need to go? Because as I said before, I’m only talking about when we get to the voting booth. The rest of the time, we organize a mass movement.
Another thing that is important is who can be pushed by a mass movement. Would you rather have a Trump or a Harris when we’re making our demands? These things are entirely strategic in the moment, but I don’t understand how this somehow makes Democrats any worse.