Something about manufacturing consent? Lying under false pretenses?
The consent was given to the person the AI invented, not the human.
Prompted by this hellsite post:
My take is yes it is SA. But I thought everyone would be interested in this new ethical question AI is bringing to hellworld.
Ask Hexbear is the place to ask and answer ~~thought-provoking~~ questions.
Rules:
Posts must ask a question.
If the question asked is serious, answer seriously.
Questions where you want to learn more about socialism are allowed, but questions in bad faith are not.
Try [email protected] if you're having questions about regarding moderation, site policy, the site itself, development, volunteering or the mod team.
There's possibly a separate question here of whether lying about yourself to get someone's attention or time commitment is a violation. Is it violating someone to use a bot to fabricate a response to them (in any situation) that may or may not be true to the response you would give? But then the prospect of sex following a commitment of time and attention is very closely tied in.
It's definitely wasting people's time if they wouldn't give the time of day to the human doing the copy-pasting.