49
EU opens door to funding nuclear energy in next budget
(www.reuters.com)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 20 Jul 2025
49 points (100.0% liked)
Europe
6842 readers
790 users here now
News and information from Europe 🇪🇺
(Current banner: La Mancha, Spain. Feel free to post submissions for banner images.)
Rules (2024-08-30)
- This is an English-language community. Comments should be in English. Posts can link to non-English news sources when providing a full-text translation in the post description. Automated translations are fine, as long as they don't overly distort the content.
- No links to misinformation or commercial advertising. When you post outdated/historic articles, add the year of publication to the post title. Infographics must include a source and a year of creation; if possible, also provide a link to the source.
- Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. Don't post direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments. Don't troll nor incite hatred. Don't look for novel argumentation strategies at Wikipedia's List of fallacies.
- No bigotry, sexism, racism, antisemitism, islamophobia, dehumanization of minorities, or glorification of National Socialism. We follow German law; don't question the statehood of Israel.
- Be the signal, not the noise: Strive to post insightful comments. Add "/s" when you're being sarcastic (and don't use it to break rule no. 3).
- If you link to paywalled information, please provide also a link to a freely available archived version. Alternatively, try to find a different source.
- Light-hearted content, memes, and posts about your European everyday belong in other communities.
- Don't evade bans. If we notice ban evasion, that will result in a permanent ban for all the accounts we can associate with you.
- No posts linking to speculative reporting about ongoing events with unclear backgrounds. Please wait at least 12 hours. (E.g., do not post breathless reporting on an ongoing terror attack.)
- Always provide context with posts: Don't post uncontextualized images or videos, and don't start discussions without giving some context first.
(This list may get expanded as necessary.)
Posts that link to the following sources will be removed
- on any topic: Al Mayadeen, brusselssignal:eu, citjourno:com, europesays:com, Breitbart, Daily Caller, Fox, GB News, geo-trends:eu, news-pravda:com, OAN, RT, sociable:co, any AI slop sites (when in doubt please look for a credible imprint/about page), change:org (for privacy reasons)
- on Middle-East topics: Al Jazeera
- on Hungary: Euronews
Unless they're the only sources, please also avoid The Sun, Daily Mail, any "thinktank" type organization, and non-Lemmy social media. Don't link to Twitter directly, instead use xcancel.com. For Reddit, use old:reddit:com
(Lists may get expanded as necessary.)
Ban lengths, etc.
We will use some leeway to decide whether to remove a comment.
If need be, there are also bans: 3 days for lighter offenses, 7 or 14 days for bigger offenses, and permanent bans for people who don't show any willingness to participate productively. If we think the ban reason is obvious, we may not specifically write to you.
If you want to protest a removal or ban, feel free to write privately to the primary mod account @[email protected]
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Fuck off Germany!
Your "Atomkraft? Nein danke!" movement fucked us all on the fossil fuel shit for decades, let's give nuke power a chance again!
We will never get rid of the baseload power usage, so let's use the cleanest stable power generation we have for it, nuclear power.
I'll be happy with the renewables plus battery storage now, while you continue to burn fossile fuel while you wait for 25 years to complete building your nuclear reactors and pay tripple of what you planned 🤷
Promoting nuclear power at this point in time is a psyop by the fossile fuel industry 🤦
The main reason as to why it takes so long to build nuclear powerplants are legal, the actual construction takes 6-8 years.
25 years is an artificial span of time that easily can be slashed by at least half.
You are acting like renewables and batteries have zero problems.
Battery storage does have problems, batteries are consumed through charge/discharge cycles, they will need to be rebuilt continuously as they are being used. They can also only provide DC, and will need inverters to produce AC, adding complexity.
Renewables also have problems, you can't recycle wind power plants, they are made our of glass fiber, and are crushed and buried when they are torn down, solar panels loose efficiency over time, hydro power decimate local fish populations, and so on.
Now, I am not blind to the fact that renewables are getting better and better, but fact of the matter is that we have for decades been told that renewables are just a few years away from taking over, and it has not happened, meanwhile countries has closed the Evil(TM) nuclear powerplants they had, but kept the fossil fueled plants they have and people have cheered!
People have cheered the closing of plants that require one train car of fuel every few years, while keeping plats that require kilometer long trains of coal every single day.
That is insanity!
That is why I don't trust the anti nuke crowd.
One of my suggestions is the following:
The EU funds a simple drop in reactor package that can be put into an existing fossil plant, and puts a plan up for modifying every fossil plant to be a nuclear plant.
Then we don't need to deal with as much legal paperwork, nor do we need to build a completely new facility, or build new power infrastructure.
What about the nuclear waste I hear you ask.
Well, that is a fair question, that require careful consideration and planning, it isn't as if there is a place with a stable bedrock, stable political climate and has a well educated workforce, oh wait! My home country of Sweden has everything needed!
We have a very stable bedrock, stable political climate and have experience in building underground facilities and nuclear physics. I have for a long time believed that we in Sweden should shoulder the responsibility of dealing with nuclear waste from the global community, I believe it would even be profitable to do so in the long run.
Now, I am aware that nuclear power won't last for ever, I see it as a transition technology that will give us about 100-200 years of breathing room to get a dynamic power grid and renewables going.
Eh? Renewables are taking over as we speak. Under what rock are you living? Nuclear power plants are outdated, expensive and totally unecessary 🤷
So far, I haven't seen renewables actually taking over the baseload for a long period of time, for dynamic demand, renewables are brilliant, but that is not what we are talking about.
They already do in many countries, please update yourself. The last 5 years saw massive improvements in this field.
Since you have the data, please share your sources, if renewables have completely been able to run a country for an entire year, that is indeed a huge achivement!
Yes, there are many countries that achive that (if you include hydropower).
Yet you don't include any source, interesting