700
Efficency (pawb.social)
submitted 1 day ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

Source (Bluesky)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] [email protected] 8 points 23 hours ago

As I said, I don't know if it's one AI service or several and there might be only one now but in the not so distant future, there might be a market or individualizable versions.

And coordination, exchanging addresses and sending and receiving encrypted messages might be too big of an overhead and delay for the user experience.

You shouldn't overestimate efficiency. Often the easiest solution is good enough. It would cost real and good paid people to solve this and the other version is less prone to problems.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 15 hours ago

You shouldn't underestimate profit motive. They aren't going to do it for the sake of efficiency, but they will certainly do it for the sake of money. It is ludicrous to think this degree of cost optimization hasn't already been implemented.

this post was submitted on 12 Jul 2025
700 points (99.3% liked)

Fuck AI

3448 readers
1364 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS