this post was submitted on 17 Aug 2023
167 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13446 readers
782 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Vaush posts go in the_dunk_tank

Dunk posts in general go in the_dunk_tank, not here

Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from the_dunk_tank

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 31 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I've studied nuclear weapons. I'm no physicist but I've read pretty extensively on the after-effects.

These people are fucking stupid

Do they address why they have smaller yields? Because targeting systems are much more advanced. That's it. That's the reason. It's like arguing it's better to be shot in the heart with a single round rather than blasted with buckshot in the center of the chest. You're still fucking dead.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 year ago (7 children)

I have a PhD in nuclear physics from a top 10 science guy university in the world, and I don't believe nuclear armageddon is a problem. And I'm also not interested in discussing it (just so that no one comes with bs talking points, I've seen enough). I'm just saying this so that you don't stumble on your own delusional bubble too much.

You don't believe in science. You believe in TV. You haven't read a single peer reviewed paper on the matter, let alone papers that have a different point of view. So spare me your condescending bullshit.

Now go ahead and downvote me so that you can sleep better at night after having excluded me, the infidel. Just remember that many people out there have degrees, educated and read 100 times on the matter than you and disagree with your delusions on the matter. Enjoy four faith in TV.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 year ago

Your posting power is unmatched, comrade.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Is that a copypasta?

EDIT: Shit, it is. Worse, I saw the pasta being made, fresh, and lost track because there was so much of it. failure

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 year ago (1 children)

babe wake up new site taglines just dropped

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 year ago

Me when the TV gods fail me: whywhywhywhywhy

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Your post is totally useless and needlessly hostile.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's a copy paste from another thread where someone says he has a phd in particle physics and says this about climate change

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Is that the same self described particle physicist that claims to have credientials ready to show (that somehow have something to do with climate change authority while also saying ecology is not a real scientific field) but demands a wager under dubious win conditions in Le Bitcoin before showing any evidence?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Science is about demanding thousands of dollars in internet funny money before presenting claimed credentials.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

I simply wouldn't claim intimate knowledge of scientific consensus in a field I don't study extensively