198
submitted 5 days ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] [email protected] 46 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Let's take that as true. Is it not then incumbent upon the person saying this to think about why so much of her audience would hate it, what that says about her own position, and how to incorporate this line of questioning into her future analysis? Especially someone who considers herself a public intellectual on some level? Between this and the "tankies are just palette-swapped capitalists who uncritically support anti-west factions out of nothing but sheer ontological contrariansim" take yesterday, the thing that irks me about her (and all libs) isn't that she's wrong, it's that she's so smug and self-satisfied in her ignorance, so content to just echo the same self-soothing myths liberals have always told about communists to assure themselves of the innate superiority of their own ideas and minds without having to go through the tedious formality of actually engaging with the ideas and minds of others.

[-] [email protected] 49 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

she wants to frame it as a minefield topic that her audience would be overly critical of and exaggerate her positions. But lots of creators have made videos already. Shaun, for example, made a perfectly succinct video that garnered no controversy. the simplest question is what takes would she be compelled to include in her video that Shaun did not?

Well, No controversy from his community. the contrapoints subreddit on the other handhad some things to say

[-] [email protected] 35 points 5 days ago

I find the "lmao u'lll get really mad so I won't say" shit really cowardly tbh. But then considering she believes that to say anything, she has to take two hours to do it, then maybe I can see why she can't be bothered.

[-] [email protected] 29 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Liberalism with Ent tree characteristics

[-] [email protected] 14 points 5 days ago
[-] [email protected] 21 points 5 days ago

yes, it's staggering how he was able to condense it down to a mere 87 minutes, but remember this was released only 4.5 months after October 7th, so he had less ground he needed to cover.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 5 days ago
[-] [email protected] 3 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

A Reddit link was detected in your comment. Here are links to the same location on alternative frontends that protect your privacy.

[-] [email protected] 15 points 5 days ago

Is it not then incumbent upon the person saying this to think about why so much of her audience would hate it, what that says about her own position, and how to incorporate this line of questioning into her future analysis?

This would be possible if her goal wasn't to just make money to fund treats.

this post was submitted on 21 Jun 2025
198 points (94.2% liked)

El Chisme

442 readers
281 users here now

Place for posting about the dumb shit public figures say.

Rules:

Rule 1: The subject of a post must be a public person.

Rule 2: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 3: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 4: No sectarianism.

Rule 5: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 6: No ableism of any kind (that includes stuff like libt*rd)

Rule 7: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 8: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.

founded 7 months ago
MODERATORS