1299
submitted 2 days ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] [email protected] 22 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Most cops have some kind of tactical gear kept in the trunk of their car. They don't mess with it for each call they grab and go.

I'd rather have them wear night vision for nothing than spend an extra 10 minutes fucking around in the parking lot to not.

But I do agree with the main point of the post. Clothing plays a part in our psyche. If you dress sharp you'll act sharp. If you dress slopply you'll act sloppy. If you dress like a soldier you'll act like one, and that usually isn't what cops should be doing. Hammers seeing nails and all that.

[-] [email protected] 6 points 20 hours ago

Point blank, cops shouldn’t have swat gear or be treated as a paramilitary group. They’re supposed to protect and serve. Cops shouldn’t be a tactical force, they should be public servants.

[-] [email protected] -2 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

I agree, however I could argue there are times when having a tactical force IS the public service. Not saying the pic posted would be one of those times though

[-] [email protected] 4 points 17 hours ago

Then send in a tactical unit for those situations that is specifically trained for the situation. We’ve seen how police handle those situations and I really don’t feel like escalation is the best approach for guys who can’t be bothered to do their job in the first place, let alone be properly trained and ready for a tactical de-escalation. Fuck off with the excuses for these fucking pigs.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

Okay so ordinary police are out. You're in charge of this new tactical unit, what does it look like? Where is the line between a ordinary response and a tactical response? What gear/technologies would they have as default and what would they have access to?

I'm not trying to be a dick, I'm truly curious because if we want reform we have to have a goal to reach. Change is cool but change to what?

[-] [email protected] 4 points 16 hours ago

Police should be there to cordon off the area for a tactical response in these situations, then negotiators communicate while a properly trained and equipped tactical team prepares a response and infiltration plan with the intent of non lethal response and a contingency for lethal action if the perp escalates it to that level, this part would be something like snipers, who’s first priority would be observation, keeping watch until they get a signal. Planning would be situational, as there is no universal outline for these situations. The job of the police in a tactical response situation should be crowd control, everything else is above their expertise.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

For a lot of stuff that would work I think. But it also sounds a lot like how they used to respond to active shooters back in the late 90s. Terrorists used to hijack or take hostages to negotiate political demands, not just try to kill people.

So in that case that plan isn't great when people are helpless inside while waiting on a tactical team. That's why Uvalde caused such an outcry against the police response. They were crowd control when they had every chance to engage the shooter. You're right, there's no perfect plan for everything. I do think a negotiate/deescelate approach would be very helpful

The way it currently works for departments around here is their SWAT guys do ordinary patrols but they have extra training and gear to respond to tactical stuff too. I wonder if we could do the same for the other side of the spectrum and have some officers with extra training as negotiators?

[-] [email protected] 1 points 13 hours ago

A state set up tactical response team that was trained and prepared for the situation solves that problem entirely. Less funding for militarized police and just transfer that funding to a tactical response outfit. You’re acting like doing something new is simply impossible when it’s realistically the only logical conclusion, the funding and supplies are there already it’s just being used on complete bullshit.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 6 hours ago

I never said it was impossible and I don't believe that either. My point with that active shooter part was that even if you have a really good dedicated team, sometimes the response time matters or things get way worse by the time they arrive.

So if the tactical dream team was a thing how many of these teams would be needed to get a reasonable response time? Would it be one per city, or a set amount per region?

And yeah the police currently have a bunch of tactical stuff they have around and use on stuff they shouldn't "just in case"

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (17 replies)
this post was submitted on 04 Jun 2025
1299 points (99.1% liked)

Microblog Memes

7911 readers
3480 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS