Image is sourced from this Economist article.
Most of the information in this preamble is from the Cradle; notably here, here, here, and here.
The features of an effective American war (proxy or otherwise) is that it is a) against opponents with much less military power than you; b) with very low American losses; c) with victories you can visibly show off from time to time to justify involvement, and d) with a profit margin beyond merely giving money to military corporations. The war against Yemen was none of those; airplanes tumbled off aircraft carriers, and the navy complained of the hardest fighting conditions in decades. Conquering Yemen for its resources was inconceivable given the terrain, lack of good intelligence, and the strength of Ansarallah, and all that seemed to be visibly harmed were empty patches of desert and civilians.
Apparently, the ceasefire last month merely stipulated that they stop attacking merchant vessels in the Red Sea; it said nothing about attacking Israel. Therefore, Yemen is absolutely free to create a new blockade of Israel by just striking their airports and seaports, and all Israel can seem to do is try and bomb them in retaliation, a futile strategy which has failed to produce a military or political change in Yemen for the last decade when many other countries have tried it. And if America directly attacks them in response to attacks on Israel, the ceasefire is off, and expensive equipment will continue to be lost.
Across the strait from Yemen is an interesting array of countries. Egypt's position in this war is well-known, and Somalia is under a kind of US occupation under the guise of fighting terrorism (Trump withdrew most troops, but they were then sent back under Biden). The other three are Sudan, Djibouti, and Eritrea. All three are increasingly being drawn into the anti-imperialist camp, as they cooperate with Iran, Russia, and/or China. Sudan is undergoing a civil war, but the rebels fighting the government are famously backed by the UAE. Djibouti has refused to allow themselves to be a launchpad for US strikes on Yemen.
Eritrea has a fascinating history of flip-flopping between West and East over the past few decades, but has, since 2020, sided with the East. It was one of the five countries to oppose the 2022 UN resolution condemning Russia's war with Ukraine. Eritrea sends two thirds of its exports to China, and Iran has reportedly supplied them with military equipment. If a stronger link could be reforged, then Iran would have significantly less trouble sending military technology to Ansarallah, and to other friendly groups throughout the region.
Naturally, the lidless eye of the imperial core is shifting its gaze onto Eritrea. Meanwhile, Ethiopia - a country that has experienced frequent conflict with Eritrea - is part of BRICS+ and their economy is increasingly reliant on China (as is most countries' economies nowadays). If a permanent resolution between the two could be created, it would be a victory for themselves and the Resistance, and a defeat for America, which thrives on conflict and destabilization.
Last week's thread is here. The Imperialism Reading Group is here.
Please check out the RedAtlas!
The bulletins site is here. Currently not used.
The RSS feed is here. Also currently not used.
Israel-Palestine Conflict
Sources on the fighting in Palestine against Israel. In general, CW for footage of battles, explosions, dead people, and so on:
UNRWA reports on Israel's destruction and siege of Gaza and the West Bank.
English-language Palestinian Marxist-Leninist twitter account. Alt here.
English-language twitter account that collates news.
Arab-language twitter account with videos and images of fighting.
English-language (with some Arab retweets) Twitter account based in Lebanon. - Telegram is @IbnRiad.
English-language Palestinian Twitter account which reports on news from the Resistance Axis. - Telegram is @EyesOnSouth.
English-language Twitter account in the same group as the previous two. - Telegram here.
English-language PalestineResist telegram channel.
More telegram channels here for those interested.
Russia-Ukraine Conflict
Examples of Ukrainian Nazis and fascists
Examples of racism/euro-centrism during the Russia-Ukraine conflict
Sources:
Defense Politics Asia's youtube channel and their map. Their youtube channel has substantially diminished in quality but the map is still useful.
Moon of Alabama, which tends to have interesting analysis. Avoid the comment section.
Understanding War and the Saker: reactionary sources that have occasional insights on the war.
Alexander Mercouris, who does daily videos on the conflict. While he is a reactionary and surrounds himself with likeminded people, his daily update videos are relatively brainworm-free and good if you don't want to follow Russian telegram channels to get news. He also co-hosts The Duran, which is more explicitly conservative, racist, sexist, transphobic, anti-communist, etc when guests are invited on, but is just about tolerable when it's just the two of them if you want a little more analysis.
Simplicius, who publishes on Substack. Like others, his political analysis should be soundly ignored, but his knowledge of weaponry and military strategy is generally quite good.
On the ground: Patrick Lancaster, an independent and very good journalist reporting in the warzone on the separatists' side.
Unedited videos of Russian/Ukrainian press conferences and speeches.
Pro-Russian Telegram Channels:
Again, CW for anti-LGBT and racist, sexist, etc speech, as well as combat footage.
https://t.me/aleksandr_skif ~ DPR's former Defense Minister and Colonel in the DPR's forces. Russian language.
https://t.me/Slavyangrad ~ A few different pro-Russian people gather frequent content for this channel (~100 posts per day), some socialist, but all socially reactionary. If you can only tolerate using one Russian telegram channel, I would recommend this one.
https://t.me/s/levigodman ~ Does daily update posts.
https://t.me/patricklancasternewstoday ~ Patrick Lancaster's telegram channel.
https://t.me/gonzowarr ~ A big Russian commentator.
https://t.me/rybar ~ One of, if not the, biggest Russian telegram channels focussing on the war out there. Actually quite balanced, maybe even pessimistic about Russia. Produces interesting and useful maps.
https://t.me/epoddubny ~ Russian language.
https://t.me/boris_rozhin ~ Russian language.
https://t.me/mod_russia_en ~ Russian Ministry of Defense. Does daily, if rather bland updates on the number of Ukrainians killed, etc. The figures appear to be approximately accurate; if you want, reduce all numbers by 25% as a 'propaganda tax', if you don't believe them. Does not cover everything, for obvious reasons, and virtually never details Russian losses.
https://t.me/UkraineHumanRightsAbuses ~ Pro-Russian, documents abuses that Ukraine commits.
Pro-Ukraine Telegram Channels:
Almost every Western media outlet.
https://discord.gg/projectowl ~ Pro-Ukrainian OSINT Discord.
https://t.me/ice_inii ~ Alleged Ukrainian account with a rather cynical take on the entire thing.
view the rest of the comments
news
Welcome to c/news! Please read the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember... we're all comrades here.
Rules:
-- PLEASE KEEP POST TITLES INFORMATIVE --
-- Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed. --
-- All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. --
-- If you are citing a twitter post as news please include not just the twitter.com in your links but also nitter.net (or another Nitter instance). There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/libredirect/ or archive them as you would any other reactionary source using e.g. https://archive.today/ . Twitter screenshots still need to be sourced or they will be removed --
-- Mass tagging comm moderators across multiple posts like a broken markov chain bot will result in a comm ban--
-- Repeated consecutive posting of reactionary sources, fake news, misleading / outdated news, false alarms over ghoul deaths, and/or shitposts will result in a comm ban.--
-- Neglecting to use content warnings or NSFW when dealing with disturbing content will be removed until in compliance. Users who are consecutively reported due to failing to use content warnings or NSFW tags when commenting on or posting disturbing content will result in the user being banned. --
-- Using April 1st as an excuse to post fake headlines, like the resurrection of Kissinger while he is still fortunately dead, will result in the poster being thrown in the gamer gulag and be sentenced to play and beat trashy mobile games like 'Raid: Shadow Legends' in order to be rehabilitated back into general society. --
A preliminary update to the losses from Operation Spiderweb by Ukraine against Russian long range aviation. First post here. I say preliminary because more time is needed to analyse this, I'm posting this due to the release of the SBU video below.
Olenya Airbase: New high resolution satellite imagery confirms the complete destruction of 4 Tu-95 strategic bombers and one An-12 transport aircraft. The airframes are completely destroyed, burnt to the ground:
Belaya air base:
Satellite imagery confirms the complete destruction of 3 Tu-95s, and 4 Tu-22M3s. Also confirms the 4th Tu-95 didn't take large damage. Update: The 4th Tu-95 did still take damage, Russia moved it and replaced it with an intact Tu-95:
Ukraine's SBU has also released a 5 minute long compilation video of FPV drone strikes during Operation Spiderweb. What's interesting here is that 2 A-50 AWACS aircraft are shown to be targeted, along with a lot more bombers. A lot of these aircraft, including the A-50s and some of the Tu-22Ms appear to be out of service though, missing key components like engines. We can also see what kind of Tu-95s were hit. The Tu-160s were not targeted, probably a deliberate decision as they have not played a large part in the war against Ukraine. I haven't done a count of every aircraft. I'll aim to do that later today.
Video on Xcancel
Video on twitter
For a preliminary count:
For a total of 24 aircraft destroyed, damaged or targeted (with 12 destroyed, 1 quite damaged, and 11 targeted, though those 11 appear to be out of service), this could go up after more long form analysis. NYT, who have spoken to people who viewed this video a few days ago, identified over 20 aircraft targeted. Having watched the video, the NYT were correct in their assesment here, though 7 of the aircraft targeted don't appear airworthy.
As for the specification of Tu-95 targeted or destroyed (read the comment under the first post as for why this is important, MS6 cannot carry the Kh-101 cruise missile, MS16 and MSM can with MSM being the most modern with a maximum of 8 Kh-101s, Russia had 25 MS6 and 30 MS16/MSM as of 2023), I'll try provide as accurate a breakdown below as possible. MS16 and MSM are difficult to tell apart. For those that want to do their own analysis, the MS6 has no underwing pylons, while the MS16 and MSM have underwing pylons. As for differentiating between an MS16 and MSM, the outboard underwing pylon on the MS-16 has three stations for cruise missiles, with the middle station being lowest to the ground. The MSM outboard underwing pylon only has two stations, the middle station is absent.
Confirmed Tu-95 losses by specification and serial number (where possible), this is a work in progress:
So for the 7 Tu-95 losses:
Very costly losses, and it's likey that the two MS16 or MSM are probably MSM. So Russia now has 24 MS6 Tu-95 airframes and 24 MS16/MSM airframes. Before this attack, they had 25 MS6 and 30 MS16/MSM. Only the MS16/MSM are Kh-101/102 capable.
Now for a focus on the nuclear triad aspect first the absolute numbers specific to the Tu-95 (Russia still has the Tu-160s which weren't hit):
However, not all of Russia's Tu-95s will be mission capable at the same time, some will be in for maintenance, modernisation, etc. And Ukraine hit the ones that are currently mission capable, some even armed with cruise missiles and fueled up. The most similar aircraft in the US Airforce, the B-52H, has a 53% mission capable rate. Assuming similar, this meant that Russia had 13 MS6 and 16 MSM/MS16 mission capable. They would now have 12 MS6 and 10 MSM/MS16 mission capable after this attack. That would mean, based on this assumption:
However, Russia still has the Tu-160s, around 18, for strategic long range aviation as part of the nuclear triad. These were not hit. Each Tu-160 can carry 12 Kh-102 cruise missiles, for a total of 216. These were not hit.
@[email protected] you might be interested in this.