877
Bruh, chill (sopuli.xyz)
submitted 2 days ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] [email protected] 36 points 2 days ago

Why the hell is speeding so normalized?

[-] [email protected] 14 points 1 day ago

Because on a lot of highways the speed limit is a joke. The 4 lane one I take to work is completely straight for like 30 miles and they have it set at 60mph. Many vehicles can (and do) easily go 80-90 on that without an issue. Proper lane usage and adhering to a safe following distance are far more important in terms of safety. There shouldn't even be a speed limit in my opinion considering the wide variety of vehicles on the road. It's pretty simple, drive as slow as you want just do it in the correct lane unless you're passing. Signal. Pass in the passing lane. Don't tailgate.

If they need to write tickets for revenue they can get people for cruising in the wrong lane all day long.

[-] [email protected] -1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I'm pretty sure those who have set it at 60mph have calculations you didn't consider.

Maybe there are places on the road where someone may suddenly appear, be it human or a wild animal? Maybe the road can get slippery? Maybe the cars going above 60mph create too much noise in the neighborhood? There are many more reasons one could set a road at that, and many may not even come to your mind.

And no, this is almost certainly not about tickets. If it is - screw them and follow the rule!

[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

Because people don't like to obey rules mostly

[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

Because most speed limit zones have little to do with public safety and more to do with enforcing monetary ticket infractions.

But tailgating is and will always be a dick move

[-] [email protected] 14 points 1 day ago

And why the hell is effectively running stop signs and red lights so normalized too?

[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

If you are in America, its because our police fucking suck. There are no consequences until an accident happens.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 21 hours ago

Yup, US; and yup our police are mostly worthless or worse. I’ve never seen consequences even for DUI offenders.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

I haven't seen this in Sweden, while speeding is fairly common.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 21 hours ago

That makes sense, this is what I see in the selfish US. Be vigilant and keep your country and cultural mindset the way it is or better.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

This.

I drive by the limit, and every time I say this a bunch of folks jumps in saying I am the problem when I stop my lane and poor poor speeders have to adapt and not crash into each other.

Speed limits are there for a reason. Speeders love to say shit like "they're outdated", but this is also wrong, they are up to date with vehicles on the road.

Drive. By. The. Damn. Limit. Those who installed them are more informed than you about risks and dangers on this track, and no, your car brakes are not as good as you think they are (and also there's likely someone behind you with worse ones).

[-] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Nah. Drive by the flow of traffic.

Unobservant people who are "following the rule" in dynamic situations usually create more danger than people adapting to the situation.

Especially when they get all the way in the left lane to drive 65mph while others are passing them on the right.

[-] [email protected] -1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

The danger is created in the first place by normalization of speeding.

I am aware that, technically, if I'd drive by traffic at any given time, accidents will be less likely. But this danger of variable speed is not created by me moving too slow, it's because of others moving too fast, because speeding is normalized in the first place, which introduces the problem that wouldn't otherwise be there. The lane speed should be within bounds of speed limit, the rest is not and should never be my problem or fault.

Now, don't get me wrong, if my actions can prevent an actually imminent accident (such as speeding up to let someone return to lane before reverse traffic traps them) - of course I will. But for regular driving, I strictly adhere to the rules and regulations. If this gets someone who breaks the rules in an accident - that's on them, maybe it'll teach them a lesson.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

The "normalization of speeding" is because human beings didn't evolve to travel at the speeds available to anyone with a driver's license. In other words, you're asking for a revision of human nature, which is simply not a practical solution. What would be practical is a system of public transportation that makes individual cars moot, or at least less of an intrinsic necessity, but in the US, there are moneyed interests who will fanatically push back on any alternate options. Car makers, insurance companies, bars and restaurants, and even the "healthcare" industry all profit from people having to own a car and use said car to navigate living in this country. You'd need to provide a broad and low-cost alternative, while dismantling those entrenched interests to make a new paradigm stick.

So, in the meantime, it sounds like your driving habits are stick-in-the-mud and you likely create impediments to the flow of traffic, as others adapt around your unwillingness to modify behaviors to the situation. The fact that you see yourself as some kind of shining example of driving purity and hope that other drivers get into an accident as some weird punitive recourse is really troubling. Maybe you should talk to a professional about your moralistic judgementalism and anger issues.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

No, I'm asking drivers to follow the rules designed to make driving safer, which is something a human is fully capable to do - and does whenever repercussions appear, like near the speed cams. If controlling that means installing speed cams at every corner, I'm all in. As long as it's not that, we have what we have to enforce those limits.

I also fully support and actively use public transportation and only engage in driving when necessary (which is actually quite little).

And please, do not jump to the conclusion about someone's mental health based on a comment on the Internet, this is rude and likely inaccurate. All I strongly state there is that it is insane to blame someone who follows the rules on the road instead of those who routinely break them out of habit and convenience.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

Hmm. Well, I can explain it to you, but I can't comprehend it for you.

You believe that you are right, and can't, or won't consider that you could be applying an overly rigid perspective to a problem that requires a great deal of flexibility. Moreover, you seem fixated on punishing those who "break rules." That's simply not a very effective way to affect change across human society.

Best of luck to you.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

Technically speaking, speed limits are set for worst conditions.

As in very rainy, very windy, poor visibility, etc.

So no, in your day to day life in ideal conditions — you do not need to follow the speed limit. Am I saying go double the speed limit? No. 10 miles above the speed limit is fine, though.

That being said, people who tailgate others can go fuck themselves. There's never a good reason to be so close behind another car.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

For worst conditions, it's a common recommendation to slow down even further.

You do not want to drive by the limit when the road is slippery, the side wind blows your car away, and visibility is 10 feet.

this post was submitted on 29 May 2025
877 points (98.8% liked)

Memes

10200 readers
1392 users here now

Post memes here.

A meme is an idea, behavior, or style that spreads by means of imitation from person to person within a culture and often carries symbolic meaning representing a particular phenomenon or theme.

An Internet meme or meme, is a cultural item that is spread via the Internet, often through social media platforms. The name is by the concept of memes proposed by Richard Dawkins in 1972. Internet memes can take various forms, such as images, videos, GIFs, and various other viral sensations.


Laittakaa meemejä tänne.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS