127
submitted 4 days ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] [email protected] 30 points 3 days ago

I don't think it is inconsistent to oppose both copyright and plagiarism.

[-] [email protected] 17 points 3 days ago

We just need a forever expanding attribution list, even if we get rid of copyright.

X was created by Dave, Y was created by Eliza based on work by Dave, Z was created by Joaquin based on work by Dave and Eliza and so on.

Academics already do this when citing sources, just make everyone else do it too.

[-] [email protected] 10 points 3 days ago

Academics already do this when citing sources, just make everyone else do it too.

Academics are supposed to do this when citing sources, now it's more like "here's a paper with a title that looks relevant whose abstract I barely read at the end of this sentence to make it look more authoritative" or "Here's the last paper I wrote on this subject."

[-] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago

5 self-referencing papers deeper, "oh, you actually did take the time to write the methods...10 years ago."

[-] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago

It happens so much! meow-tableflip

[-] [email protected] 8 points 3 days ago

"What was this based on and how did I change it" is a great start to an alternative to copyright.

"Bee movie but it speeds up every time they say 'bee' " is the gold standard for artistic attribution.

[-] [email protected] 8 points 3 days ago

"Bee movie but it speeds up every time they say 'bee' " is the gold standard for artistic attribution.

Me providing citations for my fanfiction like: "Gundam but I made it even gayer."

this post was submitted on 27 May 2025
127 points (100.0% liked)

technology

23784 readers
129 users here now

On the road to fully automated luxury gay space communism.

Spreading Linux propaganda since 2020

Rules:

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS