this post was submitted on 23 May 2025
779 points (95.4% liked)

Microblog Memes

7681 readers
1714 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

they are actually trying to teach a lesson in empathy

S.P.E.W. and mugblood rhetoric seem like progressive topics with real world analogues.

Her transphobic politics seem to be separate from the HP universe.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

The point of S.P.E.W. is that Hermoine is an obnoxious activist for caring about slavery so much. Winky gets freed and becomes a depressed alcoholic, the other house elves get pissed that Hermoine tries to give them homemade socks. Hagrid calls Dobby weird for not wanting to be a slave.

Pottermore used to have an article “To SPEW or not to SPEW” which was critical of Hermoine. The text clearly condones the race based slavery. Heck - even the name “SPEW” is a joke.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

I never considered that Rowling was making fun of Hermoine's Elf position.

But I did think it strange that a nicely set-up elf rebellion never arrived.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (1 children)

They’ve tried their best to wipe this article off the internet:

The trouble with S.P.E.W. is that Hermione wants it all and wants it now. Political movements take time as well as effort, so the notion of changing the world overnight is quite naive. Even when people are well-meaning, there’s always the risk of doing more harm than good.

Hermione’s methods might be ill-advised, but this doesn’t render her entire cause unworthy. Just because most elves don’t want freedom doesn’t mean they don’t deserve better treatment. Hermione’s dream of an elf in government might be far-fetched, but there’s merit in wanting to protect the vulnerable and allow them more choices. However, she ought to be careful – ‘tricking’ elves into freedom is arguably as unethical as enslavement.

Before we go, let’s consider Kreacher. Think of how he changed when treated with kindness by his new master, Harry Potter. Previously he’d been bitter and unpleasant, not to mention a liability to his previous owner. Had Sirius treated him a little better, things might have worked out differently. Dumbledore was right – being kind to Kreacher was in everyone’s best interests.

If you look at other translations, “SPEW” is often changed to that language’s word for “vomit,” “fart,” or “snot.”

The idea that Dobby is mentally unwell for wanting to be free has some upsetting historical precedent.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 hours ago

The only person responsible for the written content seems to be Rowling. And her key witness is Hagrid who is not portrayed for his intelligence in the books.

This is not good for Rowling, but I think kids would still read the HP series and take Hermoine's point of view.