1569
Critical thinking (slrpnk.net)
submitted 1 month ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] [email protected] 18 points 1 month ago

It's a two-pass solution, but it makes it a lot more reliable.

So your technique to "make it a lot more reliable" is to ask an LLM a question, then run the LLM's answer through an equally unreliable LLM to "verify" the answer?

We're so doomed.

[-] [email protected] -5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Give it a try.

The key is in the different prompts. I don't think I should really have to explain this, but different prompts produce different results.

Ask it to create something, it creates something.

Ask it to check something, it checks something.

Is it flawless? No. But it's pretty reliable.

It's literally free to try it now, using ChatGPT.

[-] [email protected] 10 points 1 month ago

I don't think I should really have to explain this, but different prompts produce different results.

Ron Swanson saying "I know more thab you" to a home improvement store employee

[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

Hey, maybe you do.

But I'm not arguing anything contentious here. Everything I've said is easily testable and verifiable.

this post was submitted on 19 May 2025
1569 points (97.9% liked)

Microblog Memes

8221 readers
2990 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS