this post was submitted on 12 May 2025
142 points (94.9% liked)

Games

38586 readers
1630 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Weekly Threads:

What Are You Playing?

The Weekly Discussion Topic

Rules:

  1. Submissions have to be related to games

  2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

  3. No excessive self-promotion

  4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

  5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

  6. No linking to piracy

More information about the community rules can be found here and here.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 days ago (4 children)

Discs have just been a physical license key for a long time now. It's kind of wasteful to even ship discs and the plastic cases anymore, some kind of little card with a chip on would suffice.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

What most people get irked about is loss of ownership, which can be a separate topic with careful management. For instance, if you buy an ItchIO game, there’s no DRM and you can copy it anywhere - I imagine many would be fine with digital downloads if everywhere used that system, but on the corporate side they’d likely be grumbling about piracy.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago

Yea, but I dont think anyone who is buying a console these days cares about ownership like that.

Physical media died a long time ago on PC. The DRM-free options exist as downloads.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 days ago

That's what they're doing with Switch games now and people are still getting their panties in a twist.

Personally I've long since switched to all digital downloads. Even if it eventually becomes inaccessible, either I don't plan on playing it more, or I'll pirate and emulate it.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Optical discs are extremely cheap, I wouldn't be surprised if it's cheaper than a 128MB chip of storage.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I meant enviromentally. I couldnt care less about the monetary cost to the companies.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 days ago

maybe, fabricating chips and soldering to boards doesn't come without environmental costs either

obviously the companies won't care about that enough to find out lol

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 days ago

That would be way more reasonable than wasting Blu-ray's for less than a percent of its storage capacity being used by a fricking stub.