this post was submitted on 07 May 2025
196 points (90.5% liked)

Not The Onion

16157 readers
1493 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Was written and created by the family... they are victims. they just wrote it in the context of the deceased.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Do you mean that the script was written by the family, and it was only "performed" by generative AI? That's very interesting, and not something I heard anywhere else.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The 37-year-old Army combat veteran’s family created the AI statement using a previously recorded video, a picture and a script written by the victim’s sister, Stacey Wales.

“I said, ‘I have to let him speak,’ and I wrote what he would have said, and I said, ‘That’s pretty good, I’d like to hear that if I was the judge,’” Wales told AZFamily.

From the article. Where Wales is his sister.

Wales herself is not ready to forgive Horcasitas, but when she wrote the script, she says she knew her brother would speak of forgiveness. “He stood for people, and for God, and for love,” she says.

From a related article. https://www.azfamily.com/2025/05/06/chandler-road-rage-shooting-victim-speaks-using-artificial-intelligence/

The outrage in the comments about this is stupid. It's clear that this is an impact statement from the family... the "AI" used here was to just generate the image of him reading the impact statement that his sister wrote.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I love AI more than anything in the world!

  • Saik0

I too enjoy putting words into mouths of other people and call it a method of getting my own argument across.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Waaah cry more!

I added to the conversation by answering the question directly asked. Which someone who read the article would have known the answer for.

I'm sorry that reading comprehension is hard for you.

Acting like more than half of the comments on this post aren't arguing in bad faith and thinking that the AI generated everything wholesale (content and script included) just shows how delusional you all are.

Edit: The funny part is that mkwt, the person I replied to, updooted the post. meaning that they legitimately found that information useful since they went out of their way to updoot. So you, and the other 5 people who don't understand how to read, can pound sand.