Programmer Humor

23247 readers

1188 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

Keep content in english
No advertisements
Posts must be related to programming or programmer topics

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

495

parseInt(5) (lemmy.ml)

submitted 1 week ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

66 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] -3 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Theoretically, Javascript is an untyped language, so there aren't supposed to really be static types. Giving type errors in this situation would be against design.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Maybe the design is bad, then.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago

Lol you'll get no argument from me. It's not my favorite language.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

JavaScript has types and it does have type errors, for instance

> null.foo
Uncaught TypeError: null has no properties

Please stop spouting nonsense on issues you know nothing about.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Dynamic types aren't static types my man. I think you got some learning to do.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You did say untyped though.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago

Lol like facilitate versus effectuate

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 week ago

Theoretically, Javascript is an untyped language…

Function only handles string arguments correctly. Wat.