this post was submitted on 21 Mar 2025
1514 points (98.3% liked)

Programmer Humor

22611 readers
1239 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 35 points 1 month ago (4 children)

At least games make sense, as the graphics get better. Though in some cases, the compression is also better. Like PS5 games are smaller on average than their PS4 versions, even though they have higher resolution textures in most cases, just because the PS5 has better compression/decompression tech.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Better than that, the lack of reliance on spinning disks means that asset duplication and data read order is less of a requirement to reduce load times. It can still be argued that there's just too many polygons, since simply scaling things back would be plenty effective in reducing storage usage and load times.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

The other problem for bigger GB games is texture resolution. Games don’t always need 8K or 4K textures. 2K is good enough.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago

My shitty eyes can’t detect any difference past 720p

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

I only notice that the bigger the resolution, the smaller the text when the game in question has poor scaling options for the 2D elements..

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

Like PS5 games are smaller on average than their PS4 versions

My favorite example of this is Subnautica. The system didn't call on the assets as quickly, or a different way I can't remember all of the details but essentially they had to put like five copies of every asset on the ps4 version to get it to run properly. The ps5 accesses the assets fast enough it only needs one copy. At least that's how it was explained to me.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Compression is mostly done in software.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 month ago (1 children)

uh, bad news for you.

All programming is done in software my guy.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

this entire thread is about software being dogshit? (this specific comment thread is about compression being moderately improved on one console, but that's not really significant)