you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 320 points 2 years ago (38 children)

If your website only works with Chrome, it’s not a website. It’s a Chrome site.

You didn’t design for the web. You designed for Chrome.

  • source
  • hideshow 38 child comments
  • [–] 146 points 2 years ago (15 children)

    Fuck chrome. Such a dogshit unoptimized spyware browser that now disables ad-blocking plugins

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 15 child comments
  • [–] 40 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    I agree that Chrome fucking sucks, but it's disingenuous to call it unoptimized. Chrome and chromium-based browsers are as fast as or faster than Firefox. Although I agree that manifest V3 is horrible to the web as a whole and shouldn't have been created.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    It also eats up like 99% of your CPU

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [+] -26 points 2 years ago* (8 children)

    The problem for me is that the built-in translator is too convenient

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 56 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Pretty sure Firefox have that too

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    *For a limited set of languages. Until they add Japanese I won't be getting much use from it, sadly.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago

    I use 10ten (previously Rikuchamp) for Japanese. I don't think it does full translation, but it gives thorough dictionary lookups (from WWWJDIC) as mouseover tooltips. Very useful if you're trying to learn the language, but maybe not so much if you just want to read stuff quickly. I think it's now available for every major browser, but I mostly use it on FF.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 33 points 2 years ago* (3 children)

    Firefox has translation now, too, on both mobile and desktop.

    And you can optionally add the Google Translate extension to desktop Firefox if you want. (It really is convenient, isn't it?)

    And you can always just plug in the URL of whatever page you're trying to translate directly into https://translate.google.com/.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    AFAIK the built-in translator doesn't support Japanese, which is 99% of translation I need and the extension (which is what is was trying to use before) either requires you to select the text that you want to translate one-by-one or run the whole page through translate.google.com, which doesn't work with any page that requires an account to access or triggers ddos protection on some others.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 32 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    Chrome is awful in nearly every way one can measure a browser. Anyone still using this as they're main driver in 2025 is technologically challenged.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 33 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    It’s wild to see Chrome going from the browser to use if you had any tech sense whatsoever to being universally derided.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Universally derided

    lol try looking outside lemmy. 90% of people still just use it and don't care

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago

    At least in my country, google is going balls-to-the-walls mode with the chrome psyop. Like every third ad on youtube is an ad for chrome. And if you're a little older, you'll remember their countless other ad campaigns that propelled chrome into the mainstream. The only reason so many people use chrome is because they're brainwashed into it.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 23 points 2 years ago (3 children)
  • [+] -10 points 2 years ago* (13 children)

    That's not necessarily true. Circa 2016–17 I frequented a website that worked in Chrome but not Firefox. This was due to Firefox at the time not implementing web standards that Chrome did. Firefox only got around to it in 2019. So naturally, the developer of the site was telling people to use Chrome.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 94 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    I don't know the history of column span but the reason Firefox was "behind" on standards was because Google was pushing new standards through committee faster than competing browsers could keep up. Google would implement a new feature, offer it as a free standard, then get it through the committee. Because Google already had it in their browser, they were already compliant while Firefox had to scramble.

    It was Google doing their variation of "embrace, extend, extinguish"

    It got so bad that not even Microsoft had the resources to keep up. They said as much when they said they were adopting Chromium as their engine.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Google was actually later to implement this particular standard than Edge and Safari, at least according to MDN. And I believe this was before Chredge.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 24 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    I'm gonna be honest, if they used a feature that wasn't ready for prime time, it's still on them.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] -4 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    It got added because it worked extremely well on browsers that implemented it, and it solved a problem that was needed on the site in question, which was very difficult to solve otherwise. I can't blame a site for using an open standard that works for a majority of its users and which makes the development effort significantly less.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 6 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (3 children)

    This was due to Firefox at the time not implementing web standards that Chrome did.

    Uhm, yeah, that's what browsers do. There are somewhere about 150 web standards and some are hard requirement while others are soft. Blink has some implemented that Webkit hasn't but Gecko has and that's true for all three. Same for browsers.

    Btw, the one with the most implemented standards is QtWebkit by far. It's still slower tho.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Yeah? I'm not saying there's anything wrong with that. I'm saying it's bullshit to say a developer has done a crap job when one browser doesn't implement a web standard that is perfect tailor-made for their site's use case.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments