this post was submitted on 21 Jan 2025
452 points (97.3% liked)

Science

3640 readers
164 users here now

General discussions about "science" itself

Be sure to also check out these other Fediverse science communities:

https://lemmy.ml/c/science

https://beehaw.org/c/science

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 30 points 1 month ago (3 children)

More humane like Nazi-America, or more humane like Warcrimes-Russia? Description unclear, please clarify.

[–] [email protected] 38 points 1 month ago

More humane like the best of us wish to be and the majority of us never will be

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

More humane as in respecting human rights I suppose

[–] [email protected] -4 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Is there a state that is not disrespecting human rights ? I for one haven't heard of any.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago

Degrees in hell maybe.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago (4 children)

To clarify, what you're doing is "what-aboutism". Asking China to be more humane is not a comment on anything but China being more humane.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

They weren't just asking China to be more humane, though. They were suggesting that China doesn't deserve our cooperation because they are inhumane, which implies we have the moral high ground and is explicitly hypocritical. It isn't whataboutism to point out hypocrisy.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

There's a lot of assuming, implying, and suggesting in that take. The original just said if they were more humane we would work with them.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

You don't at all see how that implies moral superiority? Or are you just giving them the benefit of the doubt?

The problem is holding China to a higher standard than we hold ourselves to.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I mean I could see how you could get that but it's not how I read it. I read it as they are not humane enough to effectively collaborate with.

I mean, listen, America is a huge hypocrisy so I'm not saying people aren't doing that, I guess I just read it more literally.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It's a bad take either way, and that interpretation makes way less sense. The reason we don't collaborate with China is geopolitical, and has nothing to do with ethics or China being too inhumane to effectively collaborate with (whatever that means).

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

I mean, I'm aware of the actual reason, I've never argued that lol.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

China could stand to be more humane, but it wouldn't make the US cooperate with them.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

Honestly China might start looking moderate compared to what I expect our new Dear Leader to do in the coming years.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Try to read up and understand what whataboutism means. Because you clearly didn't get the point of my comment.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

You brought up other societies as compared them to us. It's the definition of what-aboutism, just read up on it again to make sure.