1370
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Bronzebeard@lemm.ee 422 points 1 year ago

Country wide outage at the corruption involved with the health insurance

Health insurance industry: we can make it worse

[-] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 47 points 1 year ago

outrage*

Also, not an insurance company. He worked for Pfizer.

[-] baldingpudenda@lemmy.world 45 points 1 year ago

Pfizer is a med company. They negotiate with insurance. They work together to fuck us over.

[-] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 33 points 1 year ago

It's a pharmaceutical company. They're no saints, but it's disingenuous to compare them to people who take money and provide nothing but a rubber stamp.

[-] JovialMicrobial@lemm.ee 29 points 1 year ago

Did everyone forget about scumbag Martin Shkreli who raised medication prices for no reason other than he wanted more money?

"In September 2015, Shkreli was widely criticized when Turing obtained the manufacturing license for the antiparasitic drug Daraprim and raised its price to insurance companies from $13.50 to $750.00 (USD) per pill."

[-] finitebanjo@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Martin worked at Retrophin and Turing Pharmaceuticals but mostly he was a hedge fund manager.

Got nothing to do with Parker or Mangione.

[-] JovialMicrobial@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago

It's called an example of behavior.

Its a very common thing that happens in human conversation.

[-] finitebanjo@lemmy.world -3 points 1 year ago

Alright well in that case all non-alcoholics and painters are literally Hitler.

[-] JovialMicrobial@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

We both know the ultra wealthy have a well recorded history of disregarding ethics and human rights when it comes to obtaining more wealth.

I don't know why you decided you dislike my perspective so much, but I'm good. Have a nice day sir or madam.

[-] anomnom@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Pfizer still got billions from the government and was allowed to patent Covid vaccines that we all fucking paid for.

Also their dick pills are covered by insurance while meds my wife needs to make it through perimenopause aren’t.

Pfuck them all. Drug companies are at least half the problem with US healthcare, look at what Perdue and the Sacklers did.

[-] Jumpingspiderman@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

In the US MOST drugs are derived mostly or solely from public funded research. The basic research is publicly funded. The development and profits are privatized.

[-] finitebanjo@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago

Pfizer being allowed to patent Covid vaccines was a failure to govern, you should never have expected anything less than that from any company but rather you should expect more from your government.

Their pills being covered or not has nothing to do with the manufacturer. The entity who covers treatment made the decision.

Let's make a hypothetical where all drug companies are as bad as Purdue, then we would have to get rid of them all. OH WAIT! Whats this? The Covid Vaccine never gets made? Nobody is working on the new H5N1 vaccine? Well, I guess we'll just have to watch half of us die or be permanently disabled, lol. Organized medicine can't be allowed, after all. /s

[-] booly@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago

The providers (hospitals, clinics, labs, doctor practices), insurers/payers (whether for profit like United, nonprofit like most Blue Cross Blue Shields, or government like Medicare), and pharmaceutical/medical device companies fight each other the whole time to make the most money off of the patients/beneficiaries/taxpayers. Big Pharma runs up prices and persuades doctors to prescribe their treatments, while doctors themselves have a profit motive in running up unnecessary treatments, all while insurers try not to pay for stuff, necessary or not.

It's a broken system, but it's also worth pointing out that the scammers in each camp hate the other camps just as much as the public does. There are hospital execs and pharma execs basically cheering on the anger at insurers, who will turn around and rip off the same victims in a different way.

[-] finitebanjo@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago

Yes and thats because the solution isnt to put different people in charge of the companies. The solution is to Regulate.

The corruption is because we voters built the system to enable corruption. None of us are better than the executives or vice versa

[-] witten@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

You are right about human nature and the need to regulate, but us voters didn't build shit. Crony capitalism and regulatory capture built our healthcare "system."

[-] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

In 2010 there were 58 Democrats and they held a vote for Single Payer healthcare. Every Republican voted no. One Independent voted yes. It needed 60.

So what did voters do after that? Elect LESS DEMOCRATS EVERY ELECTION.

If that isn't choosing this system, I don't know what is.

this post was submitted on 23 Dec 2024
1370 points (99.1% liked)

News

36018 readers
2129 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS