this post was submitted on 17 Dec 2024
121 points (100.0% liked)

askchapo

22816 readers
136 users here now

Ask Hexbear is the place to ask and answer ~~thought-provoking~~ questions.

Rules:

  1. Posts must ask a question.

  2. If the question asked is serious, answer seriously.

  3. Questions where you want to learn more about socialism are allowed, but questions in bad faith are not.

  4. Try [email protected] if you're having questions about regarding moderation, site policy, the site itself, development, volunteering or the mod team.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 28 points 6 days ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 6 days ago (1 children)

How does this work with the velocity of money

[–] [email protected] 15 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Can you elaborate how these two need further explanation together? I'm familiar enough with both concepts, but not sure what your question is

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Idk I’m kinda dumb

I did a bit more reading though and I guess as capital monopolizes everything, money changes hands less often when one corporation owns hundreds of companies, so that kinda takes the velocity of money out of the equation

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 days ago

It can be confusing, no shame in asking.

Is what you describe not just a cause of decreasing velocity? Why does that mean it's no longer relevant to the discussion of the tendency to the rate of profit to fall?

I think that velocity is mostly irrelevant or at least has no causal relationship with the TRPTF. Because it's just the organic composition of capital which changes, because less money switches hands through labour purchase and more for fixed capital. Hoarding is more likely, but that's secondary.

But there could be other interactions I'm not thinking of, so I'd be curious what made you want to ask first?