▲ 960 ▼ Which CEOs are actually worth keeping around? (i.imgur.com) submitted 2 years ago by TehBamski@lemmy.world to c/microblogmemes@lemmy.world 412 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[+] Starbuncle@lemmy.ca 28 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] echodot@feddit.uk 11 points 2 years ago* (1 child) Socialism is of course democratic. When people say "socialism is bad" what they mean is Socialism is good, and they're thinking about Communism, which is actually also good but has never really been implemented properly. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Juice@midwest.social 8 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) Communism could not be implemented properly, without first moving through socialism, that is, worker control and collective ownership of their productive workplace, but all over the world. A radical social transformation, international in scope, in which we can begin to assess human need and begin to distribute based on it, democratic from top to bottom. But the ruling class won't just give over control it has to be taken, with collective power. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Filthmontane@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago I mean, that's literally the conclusion that Richard Wolff came to. Call it whatever, just as long as we do it. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] echodot@feddit.uk 11 points 2 years ago* (1 child) Socialism is of course democratic. When people say "socialism is bad" what they mean is Socialism is good, and they're thinking about Communism, which is actually also good but has never really been implemented properly. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Juice@midwest.social 8 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) Communism could not be implemented properly, without first moving through socialism, that is, worker control and collective ownership of their productive workplace, but all over the world. A radical social transformation, international in scope, in which we can begin to assess human need and begin to distribute based on it, democratic from top to bottom. But the ruling class won't just give over control it has to be taken, with collective power. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Juice@midwest.social 8 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) Communism could not be implemented properly, without first moving through socialism, that is, worker control and collective ownership of their productive workplace, but all over the world. A radical social transformation, international in scope, in which we can begin to assess human need and begin to distribute based on it, democratic from top to bottom. But the ruling class won't just give over control it has to be taken, with collective power. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Filthmontane@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago I mean, that's literally the conclusion that Richard Wolff came to. Call it whatever, just as long as we do it. permalink fedilink source parent