this post was submitted on 08 Dec 2024
80 points (100.0% liked)
chapotraphouse
13634 readers
600 users here now
Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.
No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer
Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Iirc finno ugric languages aren't actually that closely related to turkic ones
they aren't related at all, actually
Yeah basically everyone except the most fringe weirdos agree that Uralic and Turkic langs aren't related
I've actually heard a proposal that the Uralic languages are ultimately related to Indo-European but this is a very controversial proposal
Sent from Mdewakanton Dakota lands / Sept. 29 1837
Treaty with the Sioux of September 29th, 1837"We Will Talk of Nothing Else": Dakota Interpretations of the Treaty of 1837
Isn't the relation super distant anyway? Or was I reading some out-of-date literature?