this post was submitted on 05 Dec 2024
1563 points (98.7% liked)

Microblog Memes

6024 readers
1657 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] -2 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

So while I am sure the expense per person is more. Expense for rich murders vs poor murders is probably the opposite simply because of the difference in quantity.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I think the point is that "rich vs poor" should not be a distinction that matters when considering what resources to expend on the investigation.

If you start from that premise, there's really no reason to compare what is spent collectively on the murder of wealthy people to what is spent collectively on the murder of poor people.

The comparison itself assumes as given that there is some reason to divide the victims in that way.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago

The reality is that it isn't rich vs poor. It's media attention. Most of the time a rich murder gets more media attention which causes higher ups to commit more resources. But if the murder of a poor person got the same media attention, it would get more resources too. The issue is they don't have the funding to commit the reasources to investigate all murders at what you and I would consider a reasonable amount. So they have to hold back until it is a high profile case.
So while the overall effect is the same. The root cause is different. It's really that the people accept it and don't vote for decision makers who will fix the funding issue. Of course it would take more than funding to convert the police force into something that could perform at a level where they were thoroughly investigating all crimes. But noone has the stomach for the bill, so it doesn't matter.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Jesus Christ. Did you literally just sit there and value life quantitatively and actually hit send? Maybe you should get in line.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 weeks ago

If you think we collectively don't put a price on life consider speed limits. Nearly no one dies in accidents where cars are going less than 30mph. Yet there is no law limiting the building of cars that can go faster than 30. The reason... commerce. The current speed limits on the roads are based on the point where deaths cross over a line of acceptable vs the impact of commerce.