solarpunk memes

3013 readers

66 users here now

For when you need a laugh!

The definition of a "meme" here is intentionally pretty loose. Images, screenshots, and the like are welcome!

But, keep it lighthearted and/or within our server's ideals.

Posts and comments that are hateful, trolling, inciting, and/or overly negative will be removed at the moderators' discretion.

Please follow all slrpnk.net rules and community guidelines

Have fun!

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

641

You vs the person they tell you not to worry about (slrpnk.net)

submitted 4 weeks ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

120 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] -1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geography_of_the_European_Union#%3A%7E%3Atext=The+geography+of+the+European%2CFrench+Guiana+in+South+America.&text=Collectively%2C+it+represents+the+seventh%2Cshares+borders+with+20+countries.

No, you don't get to add russia into that. That area is 1.7m sq miles while the USA is 3.8m sq miles.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geography_of_the_United_States

You don't get to super impose the usa as a map image to this image and go "see told you"

[–] bdonvr 5 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

You don't get to spout bullshit like "Most of the euro side of that map, fits into texas alone" then try and defend yourself using area measurements that are completely irrelevant to the point I was refuting.

Besides, the map above doesn't show a map of the EU's rails. That's a political grouping. Better try the geography of Europe (3.9m sq mi) if we're going that route. Of course then you'd rightfully point out that's a map of North America not the US.

In any case area is not very relevant. It's very obvious that US rail is lacking far behind. That's understandable in much less sparsely populated areas the US has. But look at the highly populous northeast corridor. Hardly compares to EU rails.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I edited my post, but my point still stands. You %100 do use land mass for size, and you absolutely do not use russian land which is basically empty.

US rails are lacking, but it's because the US is massive compared to the EU...again, stop adding russia which you keep doing.

[–] bdonvr 3 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Give me a reason to?

Western US has huge chunks of empty land. Drop those then. It's only fair according to that logic.

Parts of Russia are shown ON THE POST. And maybe they are sparse - but they still have much better rail in those areas than most of the US! Furthering the point!

But even if we go with your completely flawed usage of land area and only the EU for some bizarre unexplained reason - The US is only twice as large. But our rail system is many many times worse. Even in areas with similar population density to Europe.

The size has nothing to do with it.