this post was submitted on 23 Nov 2024
317 points (99.1% liked)

News

23397 readers
3639 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 days ago (1 children)

There is absolutely a difference between having an open relationship where both parties consent, and having a relationship where one person just sleeps around, but it's totally fine because the other was informed it was happening.

Your partner may not be your property, but that doesn't mean that sleeping around just because you told them it was happening is ok.

[–] [email protected] -4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (3 children)

If you dont consent to your poly partner fucking someone else, you're saying "your body, my choice"

Thats so fucked, and I can't believe you're defending it

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

If you dont consent to your poly partner fucking someone else

Whoa buddy, drop the assumptions. You're assuming your partner is poly. Among other things.

Thats so fucked, and I can’t believe you’re defending it

I can't believe you're defending cheating and then excusing it as "we're just poly" (Even though you absolutely did not make that clear to begin with, and are now changing the circumstances of your argument. Maybe list out any assumptions you're using?)

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

I would never marry anyone who wasn't poly. The law is the one making assumptions here.

My point is that it shouldn't be possible for my spouse to persue criminal action against me for fucking someone else in a poly relationship if we're married. Thats fucked.

The law shouldn't make it not allowed to fuck someone outside your marriage by default. As I said before, thats cool to make it optional like a prenup, if you'd like, but it shouldn't be the default

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You have no conception of how contracts work do you?

Contracts involve things people aren’t entitled to all the time. Nobody is entitled to have someone else meet them for lunch at 1 pm either. You can’t dictate someone else’s movements that way.

Oh wait! Unless they agreed to meet you there at 1pm.

Fascinating, the way promises can turn a lack of entitlement into legitimate entitlement.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

This article is literally about changing that contract because its based on an antiquated concept of some old book that claimed it was the word of some mythical creature in the sky

We're updating the contract for a reason.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If a poly person is with a monogamous person and wants to sleep with a new partner, end the relationship with the monogamous person. The monogamous person can stay out of the relationship if they know the other person is poly, too.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Sure. I'm talking about a poly person in marriage with a poly person. They shouldn't be able to be criminalized for fucking someone else if they told their partner about it first.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I’m talking about a poly person in marriage with a poly person.

No you weren't. You're moving the goalposts.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

Nah, you made assumptions