chapotraphouse

13530 readers

59 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Gossip posts go in c/gossip. Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from c/gossip

founded 3 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

207

Not even 24 hours and they're already collapsing into capitulation (hexbear.net)

submitted 1 week ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

62 comments fedilink hide all child comments

https://fxtwitter.com/Breaking911/status/1854235937615630408

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

And you are sidestepping multiple responses highlighting the flaws in your presented argument

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I'm ignoring them because aren't good faith? I didn't say "Jack Smith is literally in this situation", I'm just pointing out how easy it is for armchair revolutionaries to snear from the sidelines when it's not their necks on the line.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

That you dislike an answer does not make it bad faith

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I found yours, yours is just like gibberish.

You are here presenting the situation as if it was a sudden development, rather than a known risk from the start. You are also presenting it as a definite certainty. Neither of these presentations are correct.

No, risk is a spectrum, like everything. The level of risk changes based on the situation. Jack found it to be an acceptable level of risk, the situation changed, the risk got higher, and it was no longer acceptable to him.

I was presenting a hypothetical situation where risk was the absolute maximum because I want people to use their heads and think about it, and maybe break out of the snearing circlejerk bubble for a second.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

Talk about bad faith lol