this post was submitted on 01 Nov 2024
334 points (99.4% liked)

chapotraphouse

13646 readers
919 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Greta Tankberg countdown: countdown

Edit: 170 comments doggirl-gloom

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 28 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

If I remember right, Lenin and Trotsky were both lawyers (but didn't hold office and Lenin was in exile before returning to Russia) and Stalin was a career criminal (he robbed banks on behalf of the revolution) and soldier. Kropotkin didn't partake in the October revolution nor Russian Civil War and was living in exile in France.

My soviet history isn't very good, so others feel free to correct me and call me a dumbass for making shit up. I'd say a significant number of revolutions didn't include anyone with a title or office. The major figures that created the USSR were public employees at best in a place where noblemen still held vast amounts of land and wealth.

I think Mao was from the nobility and renounced his title, but maybe I'm wrong there. I know ~~Che's~~ Castro family owned a plantation.

Edit: brainfart

[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Che's family was Argentinian, you are thinking of Fidel. Mao was from a minor landlord family.

However none of these figures had any connections to people in political power. Being born rich is less important in this sense than being a social climber who is friends with some politicians. Fidel for instance had long since alienated all his former ties

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago

Fixed. I knew that sentence didn't look right lmao