this post was submitted on 10 Oct 2024
143 points (98.6% liked)

chapotraphouse

13496 readers
924 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Vaush posts go in the_dunk_tank

Dunk posts in general go in the_dunk_tank, not here

Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from the_dunk_tank

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

This is based on 43 states being considered "non-negotiable" and "set in stone" while only 7 are considered "swing" states

Also consider I specified "voters", who are at best only 2/3 of the total population, which leaves out about 100 million extra people

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

"If you don't like the candidates, vote for the person most likely to implement ranked choice voting and then campaign to get it adopted!" ~I\ personally\ am\ fine\ with\ the\ status\ quo\ and\ will\ do\ nothing\ to\ help\ but\ good\ luck\ out\ there\ kiddo.~

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

vote for the person most likely to implement ranked choice voting

So, Claudia de la Cruz?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago

No, silly, she can't win because it has been foreordained as such.