196

16490 readers

2805 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

267

Rule (lemmy.blahaj.zone)

submitted 1 month ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

16 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 35 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Theres a non-zero chance we could send a camera-equipped spacecraft to the nearest star and get the pictures back within our lifetimes

https://breakthroughinitiatives.org/initiative/3

So if nothing else, I'm sticking around for that

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago (2 children)

No way, really? I thought that would take like insanely super long to even get there physically.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago

For a human-supporting craft, absolutely. From what I understand, these craft weigh less than a kilogram, so you can accelerate them much faster.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

I remember it being small probes, big earth mounted pushing laser, and not stopping at the destination.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago

At first, I thought this would be like Project Orion ("nuke"-powered rockets), as Dyson's math back in 1968 expected one version to reach Alpha Centauri within 133 years

Though nanocraft being pushed by lasers sound interesting, braking remains a problem. Still, if they can prove the concept with a much shorter trip somewhere in our solar system, I'll be anxiously waiting for their next move.