this post was submitted on 26 Sep 2024
121 points (99.2% liked)

chat

8246 readers
169 users here now

Chat is a text only community for casual conversation, please keep shitposting to the absolute minimum. This is intended to be a separate space from c/chapotraphouse or the daily megathread. Chat does this by being a long-form community where topics will remain from day to day unlike the megathread, and it is distinct from c/chapotraphouse in that we ask you to engage in this community in a genuine way. Please keep shitposting, bits, and irony to a minimum.

As with all communities posts need to abide by the code of conduct, additionally moderators will remove any posts or comments deemed to be inappropriate.

Thank you and happy chatting!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
121
How do we get people on hexbear to read Lenin (lemmy.ml)
submitted 3 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
75 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 months ago (2 children)

ChatGPT bullet points summaries of people who just post excerpts from news articles and treat that as a genuine comment or interpretation of the facts thereof, with a prompt like "analyze this but from a marxist leninist analysis". (That really annoys me btw, people just posting a paragraph and highlighting it. Say what you mean/interpret. It's a lot t have the reader have to sus out what you mean".)

I don't like this. Marxist analysis is very detailed and has a lot of depth to it and a lot of ways to go wrong. ChatGPT is almost entirely trained on liberal sources, and thus results in a liberal impersonation of Marxist analysis. Marxist analysis is a method of thought, not a syntax, making LLMs struggle with it quite a bit.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Fair point. I suppose I thought if one is too lethargic to read then one is too lethargic to think, then at that point you might as well outsource it.

felix-linus tier thought, shouldn't have advised it. mb.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

Using Prolewiki as the source.

In a bourgeois democracy, the role and nature of the police are complex and often controversial. Based on the principles outlined in ProleWiki, we can analyze the police in bourgeois democracies as follows:

Function within the Capitalist System

The police in a bourgeois democracy primarily serve to maintain the existing social and economic order, which benefits the bourgeoisie (ruling class) at the expense of the proletariat (working class)[1][2]. Their main functions include:

  1. Protecting private property and enforcing property laws
  2. Suppressing working-class movements and strikes
  3. Maintaining public order in a way that preserves bourgeois interests

Relationship to State Power

In bourgeois democracies, the police are an integral part of the state apparatus, which Marx and Lenin described as an instrument of class rule[2]. The police, along with other state institutions, help to enforce the "dictatorship of the bourgeoisie" - the political dominance of the capitalist class.

Role in Social Control

The police play a crucial role in social control within bourgeois democracies:

  1. Enforcing class divisions: They often disproportionately target working-class and marginalized communities.
  2. Suppressing dissent: Police are frequently used to break up protests and demonstrations that challenge the status quo.
  3. Maintaining ideological control: Through their actions and public presence, police reinforce the legitimacy of the bourgeois state.

Contradictions and Limitations

While the police in bourgeois democracies claim to serve and protect all citizens, their actions often reveal the class nature of their role:

  1. Selective enforcement: Laws are often applied more strictly to working-class and marginalized communities.
  2. Protection of capital: During labor disputes, police typically side with employers rather than workers.
  3. Militarization: Many police forces in bourgeois democracies have become increasingly militarized, reflecting the state's preparation for potential class conflict[4].

It's important to note that individual police officers may not be consciously aware of their role in maintaining class society. Many join the force with genuine intentions to help their communities. However, the institutional structure and function of the police in bourgeois democracies ultimately serve to uphold capitalist relations of production and bourgeois political dominance[1][2].

Sources [1] Fascism - ProleWiki https://en.prolewiki.org/wiki/Fascism [2] Bourgeois democracy - ProleWiki https://en.prolewiki.org/wiki/Bourgeois_democracy [3] Bourgeoisie - ProleWiki https://en.prolewiki.org/wiki/Bourgeoisie [4] Democratic People's Republic of Korea - ProleWiki https://en.prolewiki.org/wiki/Democratic_People's_Republic_of_Korea [5] ProleWiki:Principles https://en.prolewiki.org/wiki/ProleWiki:Principles