this post was submitted on 14 Aug 2024
23 points (100.0% liked)
technology
23303 readers
441 users here now
On the road to fully automated luxury gay space communism.
Spreading Linux propaganda since 2020
- Ways to run Microsoft/Adobe and more on Linux
- The Ultimate FOSS Guide For Android
- Great libre software on Windows
- Hey you, the lib still using Chrome. Read this post!
Rules:
- 1. Obviously abide by the sitewide code of conduct. Bigotry will be met with an immediate ban
- 2. This community is about technology. Offtopic is permitted as long as it is kept in the comment sections
- 3. Although this is not /c/libre, FOSS related posting is tolerated, and even welcome in the case of effort posts
- 4. We believe technology should be liberating. As such, avoid promoting proprietary and/or bourgeois technology
- 5. Explanatory posts to correct the potential mistakes a comrade made in a post of their own are allowed, as long as they remain respectful
- 6. No crypto (Bitcoin, NFT, etc.) speculation, unless it is purely informative and not too cringe
- 7. Absolutely no tech bro shit. If you have a good opinion of Silicon Valley billionaires please manifest yourself so we can ban you.
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I don't know if this is just cope, but I read somewhere that this is by design. These chips run very close to their thermal limit, because doing otherwise means you could squeeze extra performance out of it and are choosing not to. I switched from an i7-4790k to a r9-7950x3d (admittedly, a decade apart) and the thermal behavior is very different. The temps on the AMD chip shoot up very quickly, but I haven't seen them go out of spec like I've seen on the Intel. The Intel would generally stay cooler, but certain tasks like video encoding or Prime95 would drive it straight up to 100C and cause a thermal halt.
It is definitely by design. The current generations from both manufacturers are absurdly efficient at dissipating heat from the die. The 3D cache layer knocks off some thermal headroom, but the modern chips are smart enough to thermal throttle before they hit their rated thermal ceiling. This is part of why undervolting is so effective with the AM4 and AM5 chips. For what it's worth, the AM4 Ryzens do not have temp spikes like this. And Intel seems to be hell-bent on making toaster ovens...
Weird that a Haswell i7 would run that hot -- unless I'm misremembering, you might have had one with the shitty thermal paste between the die and IHS; it wasn't an issue on all Haswell and Ivy Bridge chips, but they definitely had some QC issues with the paste drying out during those generations. I also had a 4790k in a workstation machine that I tricked work into paying for, and even on just a 120mm AIO (without the delid/liquid metal treatment), it still stayed below 60-65C during thermal torture tests (Linpack and Prime95 small FFTs). Maybe I did delid it and bring in some spare LM from home; it was a long time and several dead brain cells ago.