American gen Z voters share how they feel about Kamala Harris’s presidential bid, why they like or dislike her as a candidate and whether they think she could beat Donald Trump, as the vice-president races towards winning the Democratic nomination for November’s election.

‘I think she’s just what we need’

“I think [Kamala Harris] is the only one that makes sense. She will get the votes Biden couldn’t. She could get the Black, Asian, Latino, women’s, LGBTQ+ and youth votes. She stands more for progress and equality than an old white dude and if she wins it will be historic. The Democrats need a bold move and I think she’s just what we need.

“I hope the Democrats realize what an opportunity this is for them.” Will, 22, construction worker from Portland, Oregon

…

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 0 points 2 years ago (46 children)

Yeah really like who are these people who weren’t going to vote for Joe? Are they stupid?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 46 child comments
  • [+] 57 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (15 children)
  • [+] -14 points 2 years ago (14 children)

    And then vote because of gender and race and not politics.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago (13 children)

    It's another reason Harris would be crazy to go with anyone but Mark Kelly. You'll get people who never dreamed of voting to just vote for the novelty of an astronaut and fighter pilot.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Mark Kelly would normally be a great choice but Andy Beshear is way better in this election. He balances the west/east and is not that fat from the east. Also he draws from the Appalachia/rust belt area that Baby face Vance was supposed to attract but was a horrible failure.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago

    I love Beau of the Fifth Column, but I have to politely disagree with him here. I'm originally from rural Appalachia and I don't think you try to combat Vance by one-upping him with someone from that region. To me he makes less of a case for Beshear in this video and just more explains why JD Vance is a terrible pick, which I agree. Recognizing that much of the Presidential election ultimately comes down to a popularity contest, I think you go with the more flashy figure. For instance, I'm a pretty big political junkie and even I don't know much about Beshear. That's not to say he won't skyrocket in name-recognition if the announcement comes that he's her pick, but it's just an easier sell to the average voter: "Wow, Mark Kelly is an astronaut and navy fighter pilot veteran!" The mere novelty of that will draw people to vote for him. I think this is powerful enough to draw those same voters away from Vance in itself.

    Having someone popular running as VP from a key battleground state is a plus, too. We have to realize that much of rust/bible-belt isn't particularly in play anyway. We have Whitmer who will help carry Michigan; and we have Shapiro who will help carry Pennsylvania. Seems like Tony Evers is doing well in Wisconsin. These are the three key battleground states while the likes of AZ and NV and so forth are more secondary battleground states.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 0 points 2 years ago* (9 children)

    Wow. Americans really say shit like this without a trace of irony 🤷‍♂️

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 2 years ago (8 children)

    hahaha — oh please, do enlighten me, good foreigner.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 2 years ago (7 children)

    I don’t think that’s possible.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 2 years ago (6 children)

    Ah so you've got nothing. That's what I thought.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (5 children)

    No I’m saying you’re too dense

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 2 years ago (4 children)
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (3 children)

    “Wow. Americans really say shit like this without a trace of irony 🤷‍♂️”

    What was I referring to in your opinion?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 2 years ago* (2 children)

    You tell me, buddy! Go on, teach!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 2 years ago* (1 child)

    Ok! The thing is, you revealed yourself to be a prime example of an uneducated, uncultured, too-American moron who unironically thinks that someone is a good politician because he was previously a fighter pilot. You think the only person who’d be even better to run the country is Tom Cruise because he played a fighter pilot and is a super-successful actor, I.e. your trashy version of royalty. You’re no different than the MAGA cultists who think their guy should be a dictator because he’s “good at business”. You and your ilk are everything that’s wrong with the world and if a nuclear war happens the only solace in my last moments will be that guys like you and your potential maggot spawn will be ended too.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago

    hahahah, finally! Now we're getting somewhere!

    You think the only person who’d be even better to run the country is Tom Cruise because he played a fighter pilot and is a super-successful actor

    Well now, you're just wrong here, friend. Blind speculative straw-men are not a sign of sound critical-thinking.

    Now I'm glad you got all that out. But in all of this ranting, isn't it painfully ironic that you never mentioned one single policy but instead focused on the person(s), me, and the American people? lol. I bet you don't even know the policy positions of AZ US Senator Mark Kelly. For someone so hellbent on policy, you sure sling Ad-Hominems left and right lol.

    Ultimately Americans recognize that policy platforms can change and mean little if the person is a scumbag. Many of us put an emphasis on the character of a person because that signals core values. We like Mark Kelly because he actually served his country; we like Mark Kelly because as an astronaut and fighter pilot he ascended to some of the most rigorous demands of intellect, courage, and knowledge. We like Mark Kelly because he's a stand-up guy, unlike Donald Trump, and that he has a reasonable policy platform anchored to the Democratic party no less. But perhaps you don't understand this because you're not American? Who knows. All I know is your arrogance is leading you to over-extend your confidence past the point of understanding.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 26 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (26 children)

    It's because of those people that you now have another, better, more winnable option. You're welcome.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 26 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago (21 children)

    On the other hand, if more people had turned out in 2016 we wouldn't be here.

    Politics shouldn't be a popularity contest.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 21 child comments
  • [–] 27 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    You could also say, if the Democrats had nominated a more likeable candidate in 2016, we wouldn't be here.

    Clinton got less votes than Obama in 2012 and 2008, even though the population had grown during that time.

    And it wasn't the Bernie bros who stayed home. Polling revealed that the Bernie bros showed up.

    Blaming the voters is like having your bakery go bankrupt and trying to blame people for not buying your shitty cake.

    First, bake a better cake.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    It also shouldn’t be a duopoly game but here we are.

    The shorter election cycle is appreciated. This should be a thing. Say, on July 5th of an election year, then it begins.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (1 child)

    We're celebrating the apparent increase in voters that aren't even following the duopoly policies enough to recognize literal fascism vs imperfect but generally good faith politicians.

    If they're not informed enough to see the face eating leopard party for what it is, adding more parties to the mix won't improve anything.

    I agree that ranked choice voting is desirable. But it won't help with these kinds of voters.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago

    I don’t get that. I still have relatives trying to tell me trickle down economics works, that it is the way. Really? You think successful trickle down economics is why we all feel squeezed right now? You think that’s why Amazon workers go through hell while Bezos flies around in a penis rocket?

    Reality isn’t tracking as reality. I’m not sure how one gets to that point where a confident person in a suit announces that x is the truth and so you just start repeating x is the truth and actually believing it.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 0 points 2 years ago (9 children)

    If more people had thought they were being listened to, perhaps they would have.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (8 children)

    If you want politicians to listen to you, try voting in the primaries.

    People need to educate themselves. Look at how Jerry Falwell and his 'Moral Majority' took over the GOP. They had one simple trck; if the local Republican clubhouse got 20 people at the regular meeting Falwell's folks would show up with fifty. They got the little jobs, like county clerk and sheriff, and then the bigger state positions and finally were in a position to control who got the white House.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 2 years ago (7 children)

    If you want politicians to listen to you, try voting in the primaries.

    Please don't gloat that the primaries have had a preordained winner for every presidential race since 2012. Particularly not when the most recent preordained winner had to step down, to the acclaim of the vast bulk of the party.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (6 children)

    and BotH Sides aRe ThE SAme, right?

    If you're going to tell people not to vote, try coming up with an actual alternative action.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (5 children)

    I did not say that people should not vote, or that both sides are the same. You lost the argument and you're strawmanning. The shitty preordained candidate you wanted stepped down. We have a better candidate now.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    You said that the primaries were fixed.

    If I misunderstood you, it's because you weren't clear.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (3 children)

    You made false accusations about me and are now trying to act like it's my fault.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    How is it not your fault?

    It's your job to write clearly. If someone makes an honest mistake, it's the fault of the speaker.

    Also, you claimed the primaries were rigged without giving any actual proof; by your own logic you're the one making false accusations.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] -7 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    No it's not. It's because of those people Trump still has a chance.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child)

    He had a chance. He's shaking in his shoes now because he knows she will wipe the goddamn floor with his shitty toupee/combover or whatever the hell that thing is. He thought he was going to have it easy against the old man. Now him and his whole party are fucked, scrambling to throw anything against the wall to see if it sticks, because they have nothing. Not even ancillary shit like Hunter's laptop.

    Come sit down and watch, here's some popcorn 🍿.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment