American gen Z voters share how they feel about Kamala Harris’s presidential bid, why they like or dislike her as a candidate and whether they think she could beat Donald Trump, as the vice-president races towards winning the Democratic nomination for November’s election.

‘I think she’s just what we need’

“I think [Kamala Harris] is the only one that makes sense. She will get the votes Biden couldn’t. She could get the Black, Asian, Latino, women’s, LGBTQ+ and youth votes. She stands more for progress and equality than an old white dude and if she wins it will be historic. The Democrats need a bold move and I think she’s just what we need.

“I hope the Democrats realize what an opportunity this is for them.” Will, 22, construction worker from Portland, Oregon

…

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 3 points 2 years ago (21 children)

On the other hand, if more people had turned out in 2016 we wouldn't be here.

Politics shouldn't be a popularity contest.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 21 child comments
  • [–] 27 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    You could also say, if the Democrats had nominated a more likeable candidate in 2016, we wouldn't be here.

    Clinton got less votes than Obama in 2012 and 2008, even though the population had grown during that time.

    And it wasn't the Bernie bros who stayed home. Polling revealed that the Bernie bros showed up.

    Blaming the voters is like having your bakery go bankrupt and trying to blame people for not buying your shitty cake.

    First, bake a better cake.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    It also shouldn’t be a duopoly game but here we are.

    The shorter election cycle is appreciated. This should be a thing. Say, on July 5th of an election year, then it begins.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (1 child)

    We're celebrating the apparent increase in voters that aren't even following the duopoly policies enough to recognize literal fascism vs imperfect but generally good faith politicians.

    If they're not informed enough to see the face eating leopard party for what it is, adding more parties to the mix won't improve anything.

    I agree that ranked choice voting is desirable. But it won't help with these kinds of voters.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago

    I don’t get that. I still have relatives trying to tell me trickle down economics works, that it is the way. Really? You think successful trickle down economics is why we all feel squeezed right now? You think that’s why Amazon workers go through hell while Bezos flies around in a penis rocket?

    Reality isn’t tracking as reality. I’m not sure how one gets to that point where a confident person in a suit announces that x is the truth and so you just start repeating x is the truth and actually believing it.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 0 points 2 years ago (9 children)

    If more people had thought they were being listened to, perhaps they would have.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (8 children)

    If you want politicians to listen to you, try voting in the primaries.

    People need to educate themselves. Look at how Jerry Falwell and his 'Moral Majority' took over the GOP. They had one simple trck; if the local Republican clubhouse got 20 people at the regular meeting Falwell's folks would show up with fifty. They got the little jobs, like county clerk and sheriff, and then the bigger state positions and finally were in a position to control who got the white House.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 2 years ago (7 children)

    If you want politicians to listen to you, try voting in the primaries.

    Please don't gloat that the primaries have had a preordained winner for every presidential race since 2012. Particularly not when the most recent preordained winner had to step down, to the acclaim of the vast bulk of the party.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (6 children)

    and BotH Sides aRe ThE SAme, right?

    If you're going to tell people not to vote, try coming up with an actual alternative action.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (5 children)

    I did not say that people should not vote, or that both sides are the same. You lost the argument and you're strawmanning. The shitty preordained candidate you wanted stepped down. We have a better candidate now.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    You said that the primaries were fixed.

    If I misunderstood you, it's because you weren't clear.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (3 children)

    You made false accusations about me and are now trying to act like it's my fault.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    How is it not your fault?

    It's your job to write clearly. If someone makes an honest mistake, it's the fault of the speaker.

    Also, you claimed the primaries were rigged without giving any actual proof; by your own logic you're the one making false accusations.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments