this post was submitted on 22 Jul 2024
1271 points (98.7% liked)

politics

19103 readers
3533 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Non-paywall link: 12ft.io/https://www.thedailybeast.com/democrats-mock-donald-trump-as-too-old-to-runlike-he-did-to-joe-biden?ref=home?ref=home

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 months ago (3 children)

the current reality is not the future reality - thats their sell, basically obama "hope-ishness". personally, I think it can work to keep trump out of office. this is a generational moment and the dems have it on their side.

so, with luck, we get to reject trump and, depending on the turnout, watch where progressives settle around.the seat of power.

between the dems and republicans, they have whittled down progressive representation, but its still there.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 months ago (1 children)

The real powerplay if Trump loses would be to pass an amendment setting a maximum age to run for president. Maybe tie it to retirement age. Old enough to receive social security, too old to run. Ideally you make that apply to all political offices, but I'm not that optimistic. Not that I think there's a snowballs chance in hell of this actually happening as that would be a sane and sensible thing to do and therefore antithetical to everything our current crop of politicians stand for.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 months ago

dream big dreams.

if we manage to hobble past this brush against the mirror, then cool. maybe we don't like the monster after all.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Whoever the candidate is, they have to avoid talking about Israel and use vague language on the issue. If they come out swinging for Israel I think it would not be a good look.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

this is where you use surrogates. signal with the surrogates and keep yourself out of the fray.

we will learn a lot by who is doing the most interesting talking on behalf of the campaign.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 months ago

No messaging or surrogate can have a good answer to "why haven't you already done it?"

If instead of vaguely suggesting there might be a ceasefire sometime in the future if the dems remain in power, they stopped all arms shipments to Israel and sanctioned them until all Palestinians are granted equal political rights and right-to-return, you wouldn't be asking yourself "How do I dress up support for an ongoing genocide", you'd be telling people "We ended apartheid"

[–] [email protected] -3 points 4 months ago (3 children)

thats their sell, basically obama “hope-ishness”

That works when you've had 8 years of Bush and are campaigning on free healthcare, ending the wars, federal legalization of cannabis. It works when you've had 4 years of Trump and everyone thinks the democrats will defund the police, provide free healthcare and college, abolish ICE, codify roe, pack the court, etc. Then when you fail to do any of that, you get the shit kicked out of you 2 years later.

The dems cannot campaign on hope when they've demonstrated that they will not give the people what they want.

This isn't a messaging problem, it's a "triangulating yourself to be 2 inches left of republicans and then acting surprised when your base doesn't show up" for 30+ years problem.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 4 months ago (1 children)

How much of that was blocked in some way by the reps? Every time the peanut gallery chimes in with "what did Dems ever get accomplished?" they never provide the required addendum that reps are obstructionists.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 4 months ago

They had the house and senate in 2020. We've seen how effectively the dems can whip a vote to call a progressive an antisemite, so think of how much easier it would be to do something that every dem's constituency wants done.

But there's plenty of ways to get around congress, we have one of the most powerful executives in the world.

Don't like ICE? You choose it's head. Appoint someone who will fire every officer and sell off/destroy the assets.

Don't like overturning roe? Open up military hospitals to provide contraceptive care to civilians. Withdraw federal support from states that ban abortion and if the SCOTUS doesn't like it, tell them to enforce it.

We've seen Biden go around congress, but it was to send even more arms to Israel faster.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 4 months ago

many of biden's appointees such as his NLRB pick are better than the last 3 democrats.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

agreed. the Democrats have been abusive. cant really do anything about that until we have a better nomination, funding and voting system.

trump is a time dilation machine. the closer we get to him the shorter my horizon gets. keeping him away from the near dictatorial powers the supreme court just sanctioned is my primary objective.

I (and perhaps you) and many others should remember that the age we grew in defined us. the younger see things a little differently

I am just tryng to make enough space between the ancient vampires and our kids to allow them to have a say in their future.