this post was submitted on 09 Jul 2024
981 points (99.1% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

26809 readers
4017 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 17 points 4 months ago (4 children)

I've always assumed many of these are just editting element text, but mobile that seems more effort than worth. Is there a way to quickly confirm them if not using/having access to the feature?

[–] [email protected] 31 points 4 months ago (3 children)

I did a search and got a similar result:

[–] [email protected] 15 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)

Tbh I always assumed these AI search results posts were fake. But I just did the search and got the same weird result from TikTok highlighted at the top.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 4 months ago

Google really should remove this "feature"

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago

This is a different one. The tiktok one is just ripping the text from tiktok, and google has had this feature for yeaaaars. It's just embedding the content on the page.

The one from the OP is real too and that's using this feature called "SearchLabs AI" which is written by AI

[–] [email protected] 9 points 4 months ago

Welp, that's enough for me to assume 80% of these be real lol. Now I feel like I'm missing out, but I don't think I am.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I got exactly the same thing.

AI has no concept of satire, which in my view is a good thing, as it makes people question just how accurate the information being provided really is.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago

AI has no concept.

LLMs are nothing more than "spicy autocomplete".

[–] [email protected] 19 points 4 months ago
[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

We're in the shitpost community, even if it's fake it's still funny?

Being in the EU, i can't check myself, but in the answers someone could reproduce it.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Sadly it's not fake. Just go do the search on google:

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago

This is not the AI result, just an embed from a tiktok post.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (3 children)

Assuming AI Overview does not cache results, they would be generated at search-time for each user and "search-event" independently. Even recreating the same prompt would not guarantee a similar AI Overview, ~~so there's no way to confirm.~~

Edit: See my comment below for what I actually meant to say

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

Multiple people in this thread, including myself, have the exact same tiktok meme quote as results for that prompt.

"AI Overciew" is not the same as randomized image generation.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago

My bad, I wasn't precise enough with what I wanted to say. Of course you can confirm (with astronomically high likelihood) that a screenshot of AI Overview is genuine if you get the same result with the same prompt.

What you can't really do is prove the negative. If someone gets an output then replicating their prompt won't necessarily give you the same output, for a multitude of reasons. e.g. it might take all other things Google knows about you into account, Google might have tweaked something in the last few minutes, the stochasticity of the model is leading to a different output, etc.

Also funny you bring up image generation, where this actually works too in some cases. For example they used the same prompt with multiple different seeds and if there's a cluster of very similar output images, you can surmise that an image looking very close to that was in the training set.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

I do that with LLM a fair bit. If just using GPTs website for something that should be simple, I often prompt the same thing several times and choose the best iteration as a base.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 months ago

The best tools are inconsistent!