I feel like we need to talk about Lemmy's massive tankie censorship problem. A lot of popular lemmy communities are hosted on lemmy.ml. It's been well known for a while that the admins/mods of that instance have, let's say, rather extremist and onesided political views. In short, they're what's colloquially referred to as tankies. This wouldn't be much of an issue if they didn't regularly abuse their admin/mod status to censor and silence people who dissent with their political beliefs and for example, post things critical of China, Russia, the USSR, socialism, ...

As an example, there was a thread today about the anniversary of the Tiananmen Massacre. When I was reading it, there were mostly posts critical of China in the thread and some whataboutist/denialist replies critical of the USA and the west. In terms of votes, the posts critical of China were definitely getting the most support.

I posted a comment in this thread linking to "https://archive.ph/2020.07.12-074312/https://imgur.com/a/AIIbbPs" (WARNING: graphical content), which describes aspects of the atrocities that aren't widely known even in the West, and supporting evidence. My comment was promptly removed for violating the "Be nice and civil" rule. When I looked back at the thread, I noticed that all posts critical of China had been removed while the whataboutist and denialist comments were left in place.

This is what the modlog of the instance looks like:

Definitely a trend there wouldn't you say?

When I called them out on their one sided censorship, with a screenshot of the modlog above, I promptly received a community ban on all communities on lemmy.ml that I had ever participated in.

Proof:

So many of you will now probably think something like: "So what, it's the fediverse, you can use another instance."

The problem with this reasoning is that many of the popular communities are actually on lemmy.ml, and they're not so easy to replace. I mean, in terms of content and engagement lemmy is already a pretty small place as it is. So it's rather pointless sitting for example in /c/linux@some.random.other.instance.world where there's nobody to discuss anything with.

I'm not sure if there's a solution here, but I'd like to urge people to avoid lemmy.ml hosted communities in favor of communities on more reasonable instances.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 160 points 2 years ago (43 children)

I've defended lemmy.ml in the past when people have blamed the entire instance for the actions of a solitary, overzealous moderator, but this genuinely concerns me:

This must have been action taken at the instance admin level, considering all those communities have different moderators.

Is there any way to probe the modlog to see which account it was?

  • source
  • hideshow 43 child comments
  • [–] 71 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (8 children)

    I can't see those, specifically, but a similar pattern of mass community bans after even remotely criticizing an authoritarian regime is completely on brand for Dessalines.

    I don't have record of the comment that triggered these, but when it's something like civility, it's usually just a comment removal and maybe a single community ban.

    More of Dessalines getting his stanky tankie tightie-whities in a bunch

    Dessalines bans people

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    See https://lemmy.world/comment/10467647

    It seems this is just a new feature in the upcoming relase (the communities ban).

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    Interesting.

    Still, site bans for criticizing China is just as bad, if not worse as mass community banning.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Yes, but that fact is well known and at least this shows there was no particular intention to chastise the user - it was just a button press.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 58 points 2 years ago* (8 children)

    Gonna put this out there. Ended up in a thread on ML the other day. The poster/admin got a little unhinged, over 4 down votes. 4. Took to the admin panel to see who dared down vote him. Convinced he had been the victim of the tiniest not swarm ever.

    1000001794

    It's troubling behavior for anyone with power.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    Downvotes are public on Lemmy fyi. There are interfaces that show who voted on a post or comment.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    For admins, yes. I was pointing that out in the picture of the responses I posted. But not for General users.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 25 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Only admins can do site bans. What you're seeing is a hacky/temporary feature of the upcoming Lemmy v19.4, of which lemmy.ml is running the pre-release: when an admin bans someone from the site (temp or otherwise), it also automatically bans them from any community they have ever participated in. Lemmy.ml has always been the "beta" instance for new releases.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 25 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    This is actually more evidence that the Lemmy devs run a modified version of the code which gives them the ability to, eg do things like dole out mass community bans. There is also some evidence that they selectively federate the mod log as well. It all points to the obvious conclusion that these people can and will abuse their power in any way they can.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    I'm pretty sure any admin could do that with their Lemmy server, couldn't they?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 7 points 2 years ago

    Yes, an admin probably has access to community level moderation rights and the lemmy API is not difficult to figure out.

    It would be trivial to come up with a script to go through the community page, get all the current communities and iterate through them banning a user in each of them.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 2 years ago

    I have had comments removed and could never see why. Now I just block their instances.

    They roleplay as communist censors since that's all they can afford to do from their positions.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 22 points 2 years ago (11 children)

    They specifically obfuscate which mods take what actions so you can't appeal or even defend.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 2 years ago (10 children)

    Tbh, also harass a mod. People get quite worked out when being moderated, and being a mod is enough work without people chasing you to argue with you or straight up harass you, I suppose. At least, I can see plenty of good reasons to hide the moderator name.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    Then have a mod box or something. What they currently do is, "Post removed. Reason. Rule 1."

    No details, no appeal, nada.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    What does this have to do with showing mod log? Genuinely confused

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    If they act on a post or comment, there's no way to ask why or see what their actual reasoning was. So it allows blanket censorship without a paper trail.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    It does, but it's an online forum, not an essential service, and easy to replace. On the other hand, being there with your name or nickname exposes you to harassment from those pissed at you for your decision.

    I would say it's an acceptable evil given the circumstances.

    As a side note: asking why after a mod action is almost universally pointless. Moderating is free work and a level of subjectivity is implied. I think not having the ability to argue is infuriating but understandable.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago

    My experience with them is you can't even find the modlog if you look when they remove comments. I guess they don't federate it and/or it only shows if you're logged in?

    Good incentives to block their instances.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 2 years ago* (4 children)

    To quote the reason why calling out mods by name is forbidden from a previous encounter I had with them: "removed for doxxing"

    So yeah I think you're giving them too much credit here

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    I am not sure I understood. You called some mod by name and they removed the comment? If that's the case, I perfectly understand and agree with the decision tbh.

    That said, this is a general argument, not referred to any particular mod. I think that many people get angry when their content is moderated and they might want to harass/argue/avenge against the mod who took that action.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago* (2 children)

    You agree that tagging the username of a mod (wasn't even one it was an admin) is doxxing? If so, you're delusional.

    Mod names are visible by default on my instance so if taking a look there and then mentioning the username you see there is doxxing good luck with the rest of your life. You can't have a system where everyone can easily find out who performed a mod action and then claim you were "doxxed"

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] -67 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (5 children)
  • [–] 68 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Perfectly reasonable to ban someone from completely unrelated communities like mechanical keyboard and arch Linux? Come on. It's not like they're throwing out toxic terms or criticizing on a personal level. They're questioning the way things are being modded. Those aren't even attacks.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment